Re: [Internetgovtech] US Government response to the European Commission statement

John Curran <jcurran@istaff.org> Sun, 02 March 2014 14:47 UTC

Return-Path: <jcurran@istaff.org>
X-Original-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0103A1A04A8 for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Mar 2014 06:47:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QUxfGUQj7waI for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Mar 2014 06:47:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org (mho-03-ewr.mailhop.org [204.13.248.66]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 545871A0495 for <internetgovtech@iab.org>; Sun, 2 Mar 2014 06:47:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [12.230.92.4] (helo=[10.1.130.66]) by mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <jcurran@istaff.org>) id 1WK7fW-000NU1-Or; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 14:47:06 +0000
X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn
X-Originating-IP: 12.230.92.4
X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information)
X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX1+cev8Lsi+F/Dv/X7xG5jjp
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\))
From: John Curran <jcurran@istaff.org>
In-Reply-To: <20140302135552.GA4234@mx1.yitter.info>
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2014 09:47:02 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8345ADF5-2C9B-4D84-9595-EC7EBC6239F1@istaff.org>
References: <C04D25DF-CE86-4696-8A0B-9E9C274A4F82@firsthand.net> <CAOLD2+YJ7O3CEHFfgV-fcyaYSP6ZkN52GSU6EdO=CgoG7p2JRQ@mail.gmail.com> <52FD9183.8090101@gmail.com> <CAOLD2+aRC0nBcKakpmLdqg0mdzhryA=aYbcENs4aSUg7ZSLKeg@mail.gmail.com> <01a701cf3248$fac2ac90$f04805b0$@riw.us> <CAOLD2+bRfDPakgeUZhhZnMqsvTYkU=jpimgUD1mxmB34z6vynQ@mail.gmail.com> <018d01cf32f6$eca825a0$c5f870e0$@riw.us> <CAOLD2+bLg5EN_wBmmgOUr7xG8-_+TX8-XpU3iNsPTHAfUggNwg@mail.gmail.com> <013e01cf3613$293b89c0$7bb29d40$@riw.us> <CAOLD2+Z0r6LNjeHC98a8kX2fN-Ft=H40QmrkSiHfTV_uiG1-EQ@mail.gmail.com> <20140302135552.GA4234@mx1.yitter.info>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/internetgovtech/ItCMhbnETy4O4_wX8euZmleo_Dk
Cc: internetgovtech@iab.org
Subject: Re: [Internetgovtech] US Government response to the European Commission statement
X-BeenThere: internetgovtech@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Governance and IETF technical work <internetgovtech.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.iab.org/mail-archive/web/internetgovtech/>
List-Post: <mailto:internetgovtech@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2014 14:47:11 -0000

On Mar 2, 2014, at 8:55 AM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:
> That would almost certainly be
> as great a waste of time as having automotive engineers ask drivers
> whether they want the shape of the camshaft changed.

What might not be a waste of time is when the automotive companies note to 
governments (who assert to be representative the interests of their people) 
that it would be quite a bit easier for everyone to the extent that there are 
more shared goals among many of them regarding fuel efficiency and emissions,
so that the automotive engineers don't have to quite as many different engines 
and exhaust systems solely to comply with diverse requirements when presented 
uncoordinated and after the fact... 

The auto companies may or may not decide to consider the input received (after 
all, they are just suggestions at that point) but it is probably still helpful 
to know what these expectations.

FYI,
/John

Disclaimer:  My views alone - no automobile companies were consulted in writing
             this email.