Re: [Internetgovtech] US Government response to the European Commission statement
Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Wed, 12 February 2014 20:53 UTC
Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B0361A06F8 for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 12:53:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kviGUHiifM5z for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 12:53:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from odin.smetech.net (mail.smetech.net [209.135.209.4]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F6A31A06ED for <internetgovtech@iab.org>; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 12:53:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [209.135.209.5]) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CBAD9A4302; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 15:53:28 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smetech.net
Received: from odin.smetech.net ([209.135.209.4]) by localhost (ronin.smeinc.net [209.135.209.5]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yoTbWYcaSP2n; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 15:53:06 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [172.20.40.95] (unknown [12.189.153.253]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B4449A42C5; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 15:53:07 -0500 (EST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-526--533163196"
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <73481820-F228-434C-814A-070F6A2C1F93@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 15:53:00 -0500
Message-Id: <83E315B6-2059-490A-A892-19CF6D74EA62@vigilsec.com>
References: <8E82AC16-6428-412E-A862-6F53AFE632C7@isoc.org> <074FE4AC-76B0-45C2-B849-3BFE5D4782DD@vigilsec.com> <73481820-F228-434C-814A-070F6A2C1F93@gmail.com>
To: Gordon Lennox <gordon.lennox.13@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085)
Cc: internetgovtech@iab.org
Subject: Re: [Internetgovtech] US Government response to the European Commission statement
X-BeenThere: internetgovtech@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Governance and IETF technical work <internetgovtech.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.iab.org/mail-archive/web/internetgovtech/>
List-Post: <mailto:internetgovtech@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 20:53:49 -0000
http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/newsroom/cf/dae/document.cfm?doc_id=4453 I find this document very interesting, especially page 5. Russ On Feb 12, 2014, at 3:50 PM, Gordon Lennox wrote: > Yes. > > http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe-wants-less-us-power-over-internet/2014/02/12/7e231bde-9409-11e3-9e13-770265cf4962_story.html > > A good piece. > > But I would suggest caution about taking certain phrases at their common reading. What do other people really mean by internationalisation or globalisation? > > Before and elsewhere a lot of people presumed there was agreement about "enhanced cooperation". But this was also a standard piece of EU jargon which referred to a group of member states, nation states, getting together to achieve certain goals. > > http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/glossary/enhanced_cooperation_en.htm > > But as both the US and ETNO are doing, it is part of the game to try and impose your preferred interpretation early! > > Gordon > > > On 12 Feb, 2014, at 21:27, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote: > >> FYI.. >> >>> Statement of Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Communications and Information and NTIA Administrator Lawrence E. Strickling on the European Commission statement on Internet governance: >>> >>> The U.S. government welcomes the strong and continued commitment of the European Commission to the multistakeholder model of Internet governance. We will work with the Commission and other Internet stakeholders to make multistakeholder governance more inclusive, especially to support the engagement of countries in the developing world. We have long encouraged the further globalization of ICANN as reflected in our work the last five years to improve the accountability and transparency of ICANN to all nations and stakeholders. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Internetgovtech mailing list >> Internetgovtech@iab.org >> https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/internetgovtech > > _______________________________________________ > Internetgovtech mailing list > Internetgovtech@iab.org > https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/internetgovtech
- [Internetgovtech] US Government response to the E… Russ Housley
- Re: [Internetgovtech] US Government response to t… Gordon Lennox
- Re: [Internetgovtech] US Government response to t… Gordon Lennox
- Re: [Internetgovtech] US Government response to t… Russ Housley
- Re: [Internetgovtech] US Government response to t… Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch
- Re: [Internetgovtech] US Government response to t… Arturo Servin
- Re: [Internetgovtech] US Government response to t… Andrea Glorioso
- Re: [Internetgovtech] US Government response to t… Gordon Lennox
- Re: [Internetgovtech] US Government response to t… Andrea Glorioso
- Re: [Internetgovtech] US Government response to t… cdel.firsthand.net
- Re: [Internetgovtech] US Government response to t… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Internetgovtech] US Government response to t… Andrea Glorioso
- Re: [Internetgovtech] US Government response to t… Andrea Glorioso
- [Internetgovtech] A "healthy" or a "secure" inter… S Moonesamy
- Re: [Internetgovtech] US Government response to t… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Internetgovtech] US Government response to t… cdel.firsthand.net
- Re: [Internetgovtech] US Government response to t… Arturo Servin
- Re: [Internetgovtech] US Government response to t… Russ Housley
- Re: [Internetgovtech] US Government response to t… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Internetgovtech] US Government response to t… Jefsey
- Re: [Internetgovtech] US Government response to t… Jefsey
- Re: [Internetgovtech] A "healthy" or a "secure" i… Andrea Glorioso
- Re: [Internetgovtech] US Government response to t… Andrea Glorioso
- Re: [Internetgovtech] US Government response to t… Andrea Glorioso
- Re: [Internetgovtech] US Government response to t… Andrea Glorioso
- Re: [Internetgovtech] US Government response to t… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Internetgovtech] US Government response to t… Andrea Glorioso
- Re: [Internetgovtech] A "healthy" or a "secure" i… S Moonesamy
- Re: [Internetgovtech] US Government response to t… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Internetgovtech] US Government response to t… Russ White
- Re: [Internetgovtech] US Government response to t… Russ White
- Re: [Internetgovtech] US Government response to t… Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch
- Re: [Internetgovtech] US Government response to t… Andrea Glorioso
- Re: [Internetgovtech] US Government response to t… Andrea Glorioso
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Involvement from other cons… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [Internetgovtech] US Government response to t… Andrea Glorioso
- Re: [Internetgovtech] US Government response to t… Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch
- Re: [Internetgovtech] US Government response to t… Joel M. Halpern
- [Internetgovtech] Involvement from other constitu… S Moonesamy
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Involvement from other cons… Andrea Glorioso
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Involvement from other cons… Andrea Glorioso
- Re: [Internetgovtech] US Government response to t… Andrea Glorioso
- Re: [Internetgovtech] US Government response to t… Andrea Glorioso
- Re: [Internetgovtech] US Government response to t… Russ White
- Re: [Internetgovtech] US Government response to t… Russ White
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Involvement from other cons… Brian Trammell
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Involvement from other cons… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Involvement from other cons… Russ White
- Re: [Internetgovtech] US Government response to t… Andrea Glorioso
- Re: [Internetgovtech] US Government response to t… Russ White
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Involvement from other cons… Avri Doria
- Re: [Internetgovtech] US Government response to t… Pranesh Prakash
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Involvement from other cons… Pranesh Prakash
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Involvement from other cons… S Moonesamy
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Involvement from other cons… Brian Trammell
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Involvement from other cons… Russ White
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Involvement from other cons… John Curran
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Involvement from other cons… Russ White
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Involvement from other cons… John Curran
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Involvement from other cons… Andrea Glorioso
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Involvement from other cons… Russ White
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Involvement from other cons… John Curran
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Involvement from other cons… John Curran
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Involvement from other cons… Pranesh Prakash
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Involvement from other cons… Jefsey
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Involvement from other cons… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Involvement from other cons… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Involvement from other cons… Suzanne Woolf
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Involvement from other cons… S Moonesamy
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Involvement from other cons… Suzanne Woolf
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Involvement from other cons… Andrea Glorioso
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Involvement from other cons… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Involvement from other cons… Andrea Glorioso
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Involvement from other cons… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Involvement from other cons… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Involvement from other cons… Andrea Glorioso
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Involvement from other cons… Andrea Glorioso
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Involvement from other cons… Jefsey
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Involvement from other cons… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Involvement from other cons… Andrea Glorioso
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Involvement from other cons… Jefsey
- Re: [Internetgovtech] US Government response to t… Andrea Glorioso
- Re: [Internetgovtech] US Government response to t… Andrea Glorioso
- Re: [Internetgovtech] US Government response to t… Russ White
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Involvement from other cons… Russ White
- Re: [Internetgovtech] US Government response to t… Andrea Glorioso
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Involvement from other cons… Andrea Glorioso
- Re: [Internetgovtech] US Government response to t… Russ White
- Re: [Internetgovtech] US Government response to t… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [Internetgovtech] US Government response to t… John Curran
- Re: [Internetgovtech] US Government response to t… Andrea Glorioso
- Re: [Internetgovtech] US Government response to t… Andrea Glorioso
- Re: [Internetgovtech] US Government response to t… John Curran
- Re: [Internetgovtech] US Government response to t… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [Internetgovtech] US Government response to t… Andrea Glorioso
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Involvement from other cons… John Levine
- Re: [Internetgovtech] US Government response to t… Eric Brunner-Williams
- Re: [Internetgovtech] US Government response to t… JFC Morfin
- Re: [Internetgovtech] US Government response to t… Eric Brunner-Williams
- Re: [Internetgovtech] US Government response to t… Jefsey