Re: [Internetgovtech] A "healthy" or a "secure" internet (was: US Government response to the European Commission statement)

Andrea Glorioso <andrea@digitalpolicy.it> Tue, 25 February 2014 09:21 UTC

Return-Path: <sama.digitalpolicy@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23C251A0654 for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 01:21:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 3.723
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.723 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MANGLED_SMALL=2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G5z1x7U2jnIx for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 01:21:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ie0-x22b.google.com (mail-ie0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 773FE1A03EA for <internetgovtech@iab.org>; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 01:21:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ie0-f171.google.com with SMTP id to1so75957ieb.30 for <internetgovtech@iab.org>; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 01:21:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=jNSrT08yHzrd/y3GbH6a6r/4ztX0P90C8CayZ/yDaP4=; b=0EzGcG3PxKN0y+f+HL8q7oNp59F7yAqlw+Ev0yJlASh8gq1ei9lTKeXjlczZ0iMrOE HwvCfjbvLnRLqihp1P0lX+f6m+gmYmU8oL0DAQ3nxfwep5D1qEOEVFL5VMCWBFxpR7d/ +GSJ0wiXFgK+2dOriTEbhI6mUqTH6TLA2NX49rBlnUbX/0ra3AdaywTQCQK7bZ0I1a0d CsJ80xSxq816p7cqnzARa2CMQ1oGxF/kBPgFAN9GOSq1its4JwW6LujQXViSPF5JOnyV apUx/ppwTEAGDKcKZeyONjBOIz4TP5Rld9oNfIML8UT+qtOax9/UI2XL5UNfZgs11Fcy 8xEA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.253.70 with SMTP id zy6mr18561988igc.28.1393320063555; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 01:21:03 -0800 (PST)
Sender: sama.digitalpolicy@gmail.com
Received: by 10.50.178.235 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 01:21:03 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20140213103950.0d888180@resistor.net>
References: <8E82AC16-6428-412E-A862-6F53AFE632C7@isoc.org> <074FE4AC-76B0-45C2-B849-3BFE5D4782DD@vigilsec.com> <73481820-F228-434C-814A-070F6A2C1F93@gmail.com> <83E315B6-2059-490A-A892-19CF6D74EA62@vigilsec.com> <6DCAB3E586E6A34FB17223DF8D8F0D3D0101E71E6F@W8-EXMB-DP.unam.local> <CALo9H1a+Tebzmbx=FauNeW5y6Axzhqt5ngE2GYwDBxOz-mBbSQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAOLD2+aimJo05q7KVXYFcSRJdBDxJkqa2q3sH8vFLBsKVnUt5w@mail.gmail.com> <52FCF193.1050308@cisco.com> <CAOLD2+YssAbnrgVGBDGUynPMxfVN4KoMFE6jyMr19n8L81C92g@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20140213103950.0d888180@resistor.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 10:21:03 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: xcnMF6OxDDPuGUYJrvacgOF5h3Q
Message-ID: <CAOLD2+ZOqoVwzUugj0F5vXOTTb_8bgQKmh6aijEqfWwireyASw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andrea Glorioso <andrea@digitalpolicy.it>
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113475f472614d04f3379b17"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/internetgovtech/gWehI0iNV5BLFz_aEbYKnW5baL0
Cc: "internetgovtech@iab.org" <internetgovtech@iab.org>, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Internetgovtech] A "healthy" or a "secure" internet (was: US Government response to the European Commission statement)
X-BeenThere: internetgovtech@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Governance and IETF technical work <internetgovtech.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.iab.org/mail-archive/web/internetgovtech/>
List-Post: <mailto:internetgovtech@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 09:21:06 -0000

Dear SM, all,

sorry for the belated replies. Increased workload + health issues in the
family.

On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 7:58 PM, S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> wrote:

> Hi Andrea,
> At 09:47 13-02-2014, Andrea Glorioso wrote:
>
>> I think that the notion of "growing" can be defined in a way that would
>> not be very much open to debate. But how do we define what is a "healthy"
>> or a "secure" Internet?
>>
>
> Credits to Detlef Bosau for the following:
>
>   "But you will agree: WHEN you are interested in scientific questions,
> don't
>    ask students or professors, but ask a kid."
>
> To answer the first (quoted) question I would ask the person what he or
> she considers as a "healthy" or a "secure" internet.
>

The first step in any conversation which aims to be productive for all
parties is to make sure there is a common understanding of the terms of the
discussion (but see my PS below)

At a certain point, however, it becomes rather cumbersome to check each and
every time what each term means. That's not how social systems work.

Coming to the IETF, I think I have a rather good idea of what this
community considers to be a "secure" Internet. I'm less sure there is a
shared understanding of what "healthy" means.

Hence my question.

Best,

Andrea

--
I speak only for myself. Sometimes I do not even agree with myself. Keep it
in mind.
Twitter: @andreaglorioso
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/andrea.glorioso
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=1749288&trk=tab_pro

PS: actually, there can be cases in which it is actually productive and
perfectly logical (although not very sustainable) for each party to make
sure that each word has a different meaning, in order to be able to later
claim that there was an agreement, but also that what was concluded has the
specific meaning each party wants it to have. I understand this sounds like
anathema to a specification-setting body, but it does happen in many walks
of life, from romantic relationships to global political negotiations.
Anyway, I don't want to digress. ;)