Re: Why one Internet?
Pars Mutaf <pars.mutaf@gmail.com> Tue, 10 April 2012 15:46 UTC
Return-Path: <pars.mutaf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB3C911E810F for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 08:46:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.438
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.438 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.160, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gkVxWsS3c63L for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 08:45:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-f172.google.com (mail-ob0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32B9B11E80CB for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 08:45:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by obbtb4 with SMTP id tb4so8390722obb.31 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 08:45:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=QvtgKtKlaUigRlzXC1tn4P3ljsv9fhy//74dXWLMJ8U=; b=wFCmnp78cHw5/ZYS/wvbeWvtlmWK2SUiImqcUxt7xhiJViEH88QzOCxw4+p1Cy3/jm BpA4+4rtJrJNJiFFxF7KeBfyXoCOo4pkgldZiqxazzx1Ylj2sEfxYVNRILBVH9Nkj1Ns mmXj1ryY//RfWMbQIEjQF1Xw/SG4+arArN49Q5cyXDBWFzszMgkc9+JBAVF8w1tyj1nK 49JtZbBURTRHNYc+nqvL7RmUuBIGsO5foE8ccybB2Irnr2m9o9TABkEKa231OL1y9uu0 xGzFkSkLN8coLPZrgVB0KD2FP/Ptwp/YTVy0b57Bvj4exRyD5MScxOuBkLuef7hrCp/Z 3bCw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.174.101 with SMTP id br5mr17102202obc.0.1334072751796; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 08:45:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.182.117.34 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 08:45:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAD6AjGTMNSyFUJAiP+Lyhb7Dr7tfpVxiRm7qzOerO7jFUYjeVQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CACQuieahKvE3VRPXcCirc4zhHokpkQVsMUDdcrjkZdNoSKpidg@mail.gmail.com> <2A473079-6CF0-49B9-93CD-F0BA27500CEF@cs.ucla.edu> <4F844428.7050408@gmail.com> <CACQuiea6+sGfYTg6iowcKYF=uYDP3AM=JiCHV=OGOiLKR6mnxg@mail.gmail.com> <CAD6AjGTMNSyFUJAiP+Lyhb7Dr7tfpVxiRm7qzOerO7jFUYjeVQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 18:45:51 +0300
Message-ID: <CACQuieZw+FXrYr6PwHfGpLOugGu=6ZfLAbupygc1-j=KYWLRjQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Why one Internet?
From: Pars Mutaf <pars.mutaf@gmail.com>
To: Cameron Byrne <cb.list6@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="e89a8f64672979b0ff04bd550426"
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org, Lixia Zhang <lixia@cs.ucla.edu>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:46:00 -0000
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 6:25 PM, Cameron Byrne <cb.list6@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 8:03 AM, Pars Mutaf <pars.mutaf@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Brian E Carpenter > > <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> Lixia, > >> > >> The original note says "I think it is possible to locate the node we > >> need." > >> > >> So, the idea is apparently not to divide the Internet - it is simply to > >> deal > >> with the fact that addresses would be ambiguous. Since we have 15 years > >> experience of the pain caused by ambiguous addresses, and a perfectly > good > >> 128 bit address space that avoids any need for ambiguous addresses, I > >> don't > >> see the point. It isn't even worth sending the code. > >> > >> Pars, > >> > >> Your original note also says "I am not here to discuss these details." > >> Sorry, > >> but in the IETF it's *exactly* the details that we must discuss; that's > >> our > >> job. We've been doing so since 1992 to my personal knowledge. > >> > > > > I propose have a network of Internets: > > > > Internet1 > > Internet2 > > Internet3 > > ... > > Interntet_n > > > > In Internet 1 and 2 we may have two nodes with the same address. > > The goal is to route the packet to the right Internet. I don't think it > is > > impossible. > > > > Quite possible. Most people call it CGN. In fact, the IETF granted a > /10 of IPv4 for this purpose. > > You mean this one? http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6264 Figure 1 looks like what I am proposing. Right? If so, we can also have a IPv7 with is, in addition to IPv6 (or directly IPv7). I have no idea what IPv7 would be and why it would be needed, but it looks like we should be flexible (to me at least). Pars CB > > > Pars > > > > > > > >> > >> Regards > >> Brian > >> > >> On 2012-04-10 15:09, Lixia Zhang wrote: > >> > the Internet is a means to communicate. > >> > and the market drives for most effective/efficient/economical > >> > communication systems (there are tradeoffs between the adjectives) > >> > wonder if you could help explain how your picture of "network of > >> > Internets" would be more effective and economical (than what we have > now) > >> > > >> > Lixia > >> > > >> > On Apr 10, 2012, at 6:24 AM, Pars Mutaf wrote: > >> > > >> >> Hi, > >> >> > >> >> In my opinion, we can add one more Internet when necessary, then > >> >> another one etc. > >> >> > >> >> We can have as many Internets as we need, all different. > >> >> > >> >> We just need a *network of Internets*. > >> >> > >> >> The first (current) Internet is an IPv4 Internet. > >> >> The second Internet can be an IPv4 Internet too. In this case we > would > >> >> have 2 IPv4 Internets. > >> >> Obviously, in this case, we would have the same addresses used by two > >> >> different nodes in > >> >> the two Internets. I think it is possible to locate the node we > need. I > >> >> am not here to discuss > >> >> these details. > >> >> > >> >> The second Internet can be an IPv6 Internet. > >> >> > >> >> The second Internet can be a IPv7 Internet. > >> >> > >> >> The second Internet can be IPv6 but we may have a third one which is > >> >> IPv7 etc. > >> >> > >> >> We just need a network of Internets, all possibly different. > >> >> > >> >> Pars > >> >> http://content-based-science.org/ > >> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> >> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > >> >> ipv6@ietf.org > >> >> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > >> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> > > >> > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > >> > ipv6@ietf.org > >> > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > >> > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > > ipv6@ietf.org > > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >
- Why one Internet? Pars Mutaf
- Re: Why one Internet? Randy Bush
- Re: Why one Internet? Pars Mutaf
- Re: Why one Internet? Randy Bush
- Re: Why one Internet? Pars Mutaf
- Re: Why one Internet? Christopher Morrow
- Re: Why one Internet? Lixia Zhang
- Re: Why one Internet? Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Why one Internet? Hagen Paul Pfeifer
- Re: Why one Internet? Pars Mutaf
- Re: Why one Internet? Bob Hinden
- Re: Why one Internet? Pars Mutaf
- Re: Why one Internet? Pars Mutaf
- Re: Why one Internet? Lixia Zhang
- Re: Why one Internet? Cameron Byrne
- Re: Why one Internet? Bill Jouris
- Re: Why one Internet? Kivuva
- Re: Why one Internet? Kivuva
- Re: Why one Internet? Pars Mutaf
- Re: Why one Internet? Turchanyi Geza
- Re: Why one Internet? Sander Steffann
- Re: Why one Internet? Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo
- RE: Why one Internet? Manfredi, Albert E
- Re: Why one Internet? Pars Mutaf
- Re: Why one Internet? Mohacsi Janos
- Re: Why one Internet? Pars Mutaf
- Re: Why one Internet? Mohacsi Janos
- RE: Why one Internet? Greg Kavalec
- Re: Why one Internet? Bob Hinden