Re: Why one Internet?

Pars Mutaf <pars.mutaf@gmail.com> Tue, 10 April 2012 14:57 UTC

Return-Path: <pars.mutaf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8242F21F867A for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 07:57:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.398
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.200, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Tx04Il0-eTdC for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 07:57:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-f172.google.com (mail-ob0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95E8321F866E for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 07:57:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by obbtb4 with SMTP id tb4so8332273obb.31 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 07:57:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=BnnQBucAZ5uqnNMbl9wn7nIZNJJLjMaIFpmjZm4uquU=; b=fUdeLEsvlOJBZQazzfiWUNUI4fBMS/VnlsI2LrGqwMGITj5ZtOerR1mxnGek5XYeZv cat0CrhUR2tRroJ+ElfSyyBOlie878rkMtT5acmRi5F5yck0ceypY0b3aupCXlfyHhr7 gtOZCn7PosD4149v5sH8Rc9u0fqt9bphqFIH4TphP9NYvU0c5Aderw3Iw08TrZX23kU3 rSOXhBIrXedGZQU1oqlitnIZfJQxcC5nt5MAIQJIYiLQ9PKmwOrvtQTNZ0xPXGs+dmEz DNIe3vpyo4bcOuGdOYgMI5Tv0oPGZPlDH+JNOMHYOqX98w8FQt/MT/VOrQlTWln8WQKA Rdyg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.114.70 with SMTP id je6mr16769446obb.30.1334069843231; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 07:57:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.182.117.34 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 07:57:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <2A473079-6CF0-49B9-93CD-F0BA27500CEF@cs.ucla.edu>
References: <CACQuieahKvE3VRPXcCirc4zhHokpkQVsMUDdcrjkZdNoSKpidg@mail.gmail.com> <2A473079-6CF0-49B9-93CD-F0BA27500CEF@cs.ucla.edu>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 17:57:23 +0300
Message-ID: <CACQuieZ6gqO_aTeRxB+GOM2RccCTtXfksCf=Kc=+m7O0RLEVYg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Why one Internet?
From: Pars Mutaf <pars.mutaf@gmail.com>
To: Lixia Zhang <lixia@cs.ucla.edu>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0444746b1c845704bd5457cb
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:57:26 -0000

I am here to question:

My question is why IPv6 is the end of the road.

We shouldn't give all the responsibility to a few persons.
We should not be dependent on their decisions.

If the transition to a complete IPv6 network is not possible, then we can
add a new Internet. It can be IPv4, IPv6, or even IPv7.

Pars

On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Lixia Zhang <lixia@cs.ucla.edu> wrote:

> the Internet is a means to communicate.
> and the market drives for most effective/efficient/economical
> communication systems (there are tradeoffs between the adjectives)
> wonder if you could help explain how your picture of "network of
> Internets" would be more effective and economical (than what we have now)
>
> Lixia
>
> On Apr 10, 2012, at 6:24 AM, Pars Mutaf wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> In my opinion, we can add one more Internet when necessary, then another
> one etc.
>
> We can have as many Internets as we need, all different.
>
> We just need a *network of Internets*.
>
> The first (current) Internet is an IPv4 Internet.
> The second Internet can be an IPv4 Internet too. In this case we would
> have 2 IPv4 Internets.
> Obviously, in this case, we would have the same addresses used by two
> different nodes in
> the two Internets. I think it is possible to locate the node we need. I am
> not here to discuss
> these details.
>
> The second Internet can be an IPv6 Internet.
>
> The second Internet can be a IPv7 Internet.
>
> The second Internet can be IPv6 but we may have a third one which is IPv7
> etc.
>
> We just need a network of Internets, all possibly different.
>
> Pars
> http://content-based-science.org/
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>