Re: [6MAN] Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Sun, 01 December 2013 00:55 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEC091AE4CE for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 30 Nov 2013 16:55:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r5qez9TNOqbU for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 30 Nov 2013 16:55:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vimes.kumari.net (smtp1.kumari.net [204.194.22.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECAAD1AE4C8 for <6man@ietf.org>; Sat, 30 Nov 2013 16:55:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.187] (c-98-244-98-35.hsd1.va.comcast.net [98.244.98.35]) by vimes.kumari.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 90B1A1B405B3; Sat, 30 Nov 2013 19:55:52 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_A5C917B3-8991-4421-B9A1-87B16FC4B429"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
Subject: Re: [6MAN] Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
In-Reply-To: <40EA8A8A-522B-4314-ADC6-DE719969A8AA@cisco.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 19:55:47 -0500
Message-Id: <22685043-C4A7-4B9B-B358-7265907791B3@kumari.net>
References: <20131021224346.32495.64932.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <52695DDE.70909@gont.com.ar> <8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553BA7A268@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com> <52989DA7.1070301@gmail.com> <E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD84161F985@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com> <40EA8A8A-522B-4314-ADC6-DE719969A8AA@cisco.com>
To: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Cc: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>, "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>, Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>, Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>, "<draft-gont-6man-deprecate-eui64-based-addresses@tools.ietf.org>" <draft-gont-6man-deprecate-eui64-based-addresses@tools.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2013 00:55:57 -0000

On Nov 30, 2013, at 6:58 PM, "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> wrote:

> 
> On Nov 29, 2013, at 7:49 AM, "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> I attended .1 meetings in Dallas the week after Vancouver and the fashion was more around:
>> 
>> - cannot bridge 64  bits address (but the reason is more for incompatible MAC expectation in 15.4 like latency than for address translation reasons)
>> - should go back to EUI 48 for everything (and the reason was that changing all the mibs that have 48 bits in them is a nightmare)
> 
> From my perspective, I really don't care how many bits any given technology uses. If they need a 92.5 bit address, they should use a 92.5 bit address. On the other hand, if they don't need a given address size, they should not concoct a reason to use it. The IETF should similarly use address sizes and structures that work will across a variety of lower layer technologies, and perform the unnatural act of tying itself to one of them, or appearing to. The value of a virtual address is that it maps to anything…

+ many lots…
W

> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> Pascal
>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: ipv6 [mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alexandru Petrescu
>>> Sent: vendredi 29 novembre 2013 14:59
>>> To: Fred Baker (fred); Fernando Gont
>>> Cc: 6man@ietf.org; <draft-gont-6man-deprecate-eui64-based-
>>> addresses@tools.ietf.org>
>>> Subject: Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses
>>> 
>>> sidenote about this intriguing bit...
>>> 
>>> Le 25/10/2013 07:16, Fred Baker (fred) a écrit :
>>> [...]
>>>> and note that the IEEE is now (I'm told) discussing 128 bit MAC
>>>> Addresses.
>>> 
>>> Found in draft-ieee-rac-oui-restructuring-00 section 4.4.2 'EUI-128 addresses'.
>>> 
>>> Alex
>>> 
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>>> ipv6@ietf.org
>>> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>> ipv6@ietf.org
>> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> -----------------------------------
> "We are learning to do a great many clever things...The next great task
> will be to learn not to do them."
> 
> - G. K. Chesterton (1874-1936)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------

-- 
Never criticize a man till you've walked a mile in his shoes.  Then if he didn't like what you've said, he's a mile away and barefoot.