Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses
Jahangir Hossain <jrjahangir@gmail.com> Sun, 01 December 2013 15:09 UTC
Return-Path: <jrjahangir@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E0731A1F3F for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Dec 2013 07:09:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A6L_o5366X_z for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Dec 2013 07:09:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22d.google.com (mail-wi0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22d]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E2741A1F5B for <6man@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Dec 2013 07:09:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f173.google.com with SMTP id hm4so3720665wib.12 for <6man@ietf.org>; Sun, 01 Dec 2013 07:09:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=yaQSYXR2Tc+G5wS+KP9UVWhWQPEAJu6WbXOui5uKwTw=; b=P1jCirH2sZ4DHwjdHJKh1zgIxcpHSHnVU+o+AYi9VBsXwOJUAKd6UFGjbMNS3UviU0 lYXnfY5lrggjsFYSZbuZoeNSqIghYsB936/FN96Wo/e6XBKBGVssrzCvyvdH/aWr6HLq qPWT7qO8RDuXRBACzqbUK4txvlm1tcyrPrgxixQcrG1JjeS+ptvyxxogZI0+l+goUK/s dApt70u9DKIBBK7gAPNuoeWrNUm635Y0meFq3Q1BfiMnb/tlD4T6I3TZ/6vIU2SA3fiL r90K+43ElRF6ekrB4jr5U0jtY9EmPe2bnZpK319eOY6AVpiwlDoo4LwaZwN1WH/MYgz1 K7MA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.104.42 with SMTP id gb10mr14420494wib.51.1385910576597; Sun, 01 Dec 2013 07:09:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.195.13.101 with HTTP; Sun, 1 Dec 2013 07:09:36 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <40EA8A8A-522B-4314-ADC6-DE719969A8AA@cisco.com>
References: <20131021224346.32495.64932.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <52695DDE.70909@gont.com.ar> <8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553BA7A268@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com> <52989DA7.1070301@gmail.com> <E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD84161F985@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com> <40EA8A8A-522B-4314-ADC6-DE719969A8AA@cisco.com>
Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2013 21:09:36 +0600
Message-ID: <CAG5EbHLttUuNZoDkqXQ-sbahadNjfDGEcJuYS_etPKCyw1+u-A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses
From: Jahangir Hossain <jrjahangir@gmail.com>
To: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f46d041826f69bd0ba04ec7a738c"
Cc: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>, "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>, "<draft-gont-6man-deprecate-eui64-based-addresses@tools.ietf.org>" <draft-gont-6man-deprecate-eui64-based-addresses@tools.ietf.org>, Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>, Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2013 15:09:50 -0000
> From my perspective, I really don't care how many bits any given technology uses. If they need a 92.5 bit address, they should use a 92.5 bit address. On the other hand, if they don't need a given address size, they should not concoct a reason to use it. The IETF should similarly use address sizes and structures that work will across a variety of lower layer technologies, and perform the unnatural act of tying itself to one of them, or appearing to. The value of a virtual address is that it maps to anything… Agree on Fred's opinion and many thanks for this comments. Regards // Jahangir On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 5:58 AM, Fred Baker (fred) <fred@cisco.com> wrote: > > On Nov 29, 2013, at 7:49 AM, "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" < > pthubert@cisco.com> > wrote: > > > I attended .1 meetings in Dallas the week after Vancouver and the > fashion was more around: > > > > - cannot bridge 64 bits address (but the reason is more for > incompatible MAC expectation in 15.4 like latency than for address > translation reasons) > > - should go back to EUI 48 for everything (and the reason was that > changing all the mibs that have 48 bits in them is a nightmare) > > From my perspective, I really don't care how many bits any given > technology uses. If they need a 92.5 bit address, they should use a 92.5 > bit address. On the other hand, if they don't need a given address size, > they should not concoct a reason to use it. The IETF should similarly use > address sizes and structures that work will across a variety of lower layer > technologies, and perform the unnatural act of tying itself to one of them, > or appearing to. The value of a virtual address is that it maps to > anything... > > > Cheers, > > > > Pascal > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: ipv6 [mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alexandru > Petrescu > >> Sent: vendredi 29 novembre 2013 14:59 > >> To: Fred Baker (fred); Fernando Gont > >> Cc: 6man@ietf.org; <draft-gont-6man-deprecate-eui64-based- > >> addresses@tools.ietf.org> > >> Subject: Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses > >> > >> sidenote about this intriguing bit... > >> > >> Le 25/10/2013 07:16, Fred Baker (fred) a écrit : > >> [...] > >>> and note that the IEEE is now (I'm told) discussing 128 bit MAC > >>> Addresses. > >> > >> Found in draft-ieee-rac-oui-restructuring-00 section 4.4.2 'EUI-128 > addresses'. > >> > >> Alex > >> > >> -------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > >> ipv6@ietf.org > >> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > >> -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > > ipv6@ietf.org > > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > ----------------------------------- > "We are learning to do a great many clever things...The next great task > will be to learn not to do them." > > - G. K. Chesterton (1874-1936) > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > ipv6@ietf.org > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > --
- Re: Why /64 Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Why /64 Lorenzo Colitti
- Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses (Fwd: New… Fernando Gont
- RE: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses (Fwd:… Hosnieh Rafiee
- Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses (Fwd:… Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses (Fwd:… Fernando Gont
- Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses (Fwd:… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses (Fwd:… Sander Steffann
- Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses (Fwd:… Fernando Gont
- Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses (Fwd:… Tim Chown
- Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses (Fwd:… Fernando Gont
- Why /64 [was Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addres… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Why /64 [was Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Ad… Fernando Gont
- Re: Why /64 [was Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Ad… Tim Chown
- Re: Why /64 [was Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Ad… Fred Baker (fred)
- Why /64 Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses (Fwd:… Carsten Bormann
- Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses (Fwd:… Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses (Fwd:… Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses (Fwd:… Octavio Alvarez
- Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses (Fwd:… Scott Brim
- Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses (Fwd:… Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses (Fwd:… Carsten Bormann
- Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses (Fwd:… Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: Why /64 Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Why /64 Jeroen Massar
- Re: Why /64 Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Why /64 Mark ZZZ Smith
- Re: Why /64 Jeroen Massar
- Re: Re: Why /64 Ray Hunter
- Re: Why /64 Scott Brim
- Re: Why /64 Karl Auer
- Re: Why /64 Jeroen Massar
- Re: Why /64 Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Re: Why /64 Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses (Fwd:… Fernando Gont
- Re: Why /64 [was Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Ad… Fernando Gont
- Re: Why /64 Roger Jørgensen
- Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses (Fwd:… Roger Jørgensen
- Re: Why /64 Octavio Alvarez
- Why /64 [was Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Ad… Octavio Alvarez
- Re: Why /64 Jeroen Massar
- Re: Why /64 Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Why /64 TJ
- Re: Why /64 Mark ZZZ Smith
- Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses (Fwd:… Fred Baker (fred)
- RE: Why /64 Wuyts Carl
- Re: Why /64 Jeroen Massar
- RE: Why /64 Wuyts Carl
- Re: Why /64 Jeroen Massar
- Re: Why /64 [was Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Ad… Bless, Roland (TM)
- Re: Why /64 Jeroen Massar
- Re: Why /64 Jeroen Massar
- Re: Why /64 Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Why /64 Jeroen Massar
- Re: Why /64 Lorenzo Colitti
- RE: Why /64 Wuyts Carl
- Re: Why /64 Jeroen Massar
- Re: Why /64 Jeroen Massar
- Re: Why /64 Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Why /64 Sander Steffann
- Re: Why /64 Jeroen Massar
- Re: Why /64 Lorenzo Colitti
- RE: Why /64 Wuyts Carl
- Re: Why /64 Jeroen Massar
- Re: Why /64 Sander Steffann
- Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses (Fwd:… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: Why /64 Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: Why /64 [was Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Ad… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: Why /64 Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: Why /64 Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: Why /64 Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: Why /64 Octavio Alvarez
- Re: Why /64 Octavio Alvarez
- Re: Why /64 Octavio Alvarez
- Re: Why /64 Jeroen Massar
- Re: Why /64 sthaug
- Re: Why /64 Mark ZZZ Smith
- Re: Why /64 Octavio Alvarez
- Re: Why /64 Roger Jørgensen
- Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses (Fwd:… Alissa Cooper
- Tracking and correlation properties of IIDs (was … Alissa Cooper
- Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses (Fwd:… Fernando Gont
- Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses (Fwd:… Hosnieh
- Re: Why /64 Jeroen Massar
- Re: Why /64 Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: Why /64 Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses (Fwd:… Nabil Benamar
- Re: Why /64 Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Why /64 Peter Dordal
- Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses (Fwd:… Fernando Gont
- Re: Why /64 Octavio Alvarez
- Re: Why /64 Scott Brim
- Re: Why /64 Octavio Alvarez
- Re: Why /64 Mark ZZZ Smith
- RE: Why /64 Manfredi, Albert E
- Re: Why /64 Fernando Gont
- Re: Why /64 Peter Dordal
- Re: Why /64 Jeroen Massar
- Re: Why /64 Jeroen Massar
- Re: Why /64 Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Why /64 Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Why /64 Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: Why /64 Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: Why /64 Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: Why /64 Erik Kline
- Re: Why /64 Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: Why /64 Erik Kline
- RE: Why /64 Manfredi, Albert E
- Re: Why /64 Erik Kline
- RE: Why /64 Manfredi, Albert E
- Re: Why /64 Brian E Carpenter
- RE: Why /64 Manfredi, Albert E
- RE: Why /64 Templin, Fred L
- Re: Why /64 Mark Andrews
- Re: Why /64 Mark Andrews
- RE: Why /64 Manfredi, Albert E
- Re: Why /64 Jeroen Massar
- Re: Why /64 Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Why /64 Mark Andrews
- RE: Why /64 Karl Auer
- Re: Re: Why /64 Ray Hunter
- Re: Why /64 Mark Andrews
- Re: Why /64 Ray Hunter
- Re: Why /64 Brian Haberman
- Re: Why /64 Ralph Droms
- RE: Why /64 Manfredi, Albert E
- Re: Why /64 Brian Haberman
- RE: Why /64 Manfredi, Albert E
- Re: Why /64 Brian Haberman
- Re: Why /64 Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Why /64 Victor Kuarsingh
- Re: Why /64 Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Why /64 Roger Jørgensen
- Re: Why /64 Peter Dordal
- Re: Why /64 Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Why /64 Mark ZZZ Smith
- Re: Why /64 Mark ZZZ Smith
- Re: Why /64 Ray Hunter
- Re: Why /64 Mark ZZZ Smith
- Re: Re: Why /64 Ray Hunter
- Re: Re: Why /64 Mark ZZZ Smith
- Re: Why /64 Ray Hunter
- Re: Why /64 Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: Re: Why /64 Karl Auer
- Re: Why /64 Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Why /64 Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Why /64 Ray Hunter
- Re: Why /64 Brian E Carpenter
- RE: Why /64 Manfredi, Albert E
- RE: Why /64 Karl Auer
- Re: Why /64 Ray Hunter
- Re: Why /64 Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Why /64 Erik Nordmark
- Re: Why /64 神明達哉
- Re: Why /64 Ray Hunter
- Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses Alexandru Petrescu
- RE: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [6MAN] Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addr… Warren Kumari
- Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses Jahangir Hossain