IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Reducing the battery impact of ND

joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Mon, 17 February 2014 16:00 UTC

Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 809F81A0533 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 08:00:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.447
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.447 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, LOTS_OF_MONEY=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eJ5d_kePp5Vr for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 08:00:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B029C1A0527 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 08:00:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mb-aye.local (c-50-174-18-221.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [50.174.18.221]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s1HG0Kro050615 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 17 Feb 2014 16:00:20 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
Message-ID: <5302320F.6000000@bogus.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 08:00:15 -0800
From: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:27.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/27.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Hemant Singh (shemant)" <shemant@cisco.com>, ek <ek@internetdraft.org>
Subject: Re: Reducing the battery impact of ND
References: <52D96663.6060005@sonic.net> <CAKD1Yr3pCQ15uFz36MvKG3Q_Vzt27ws0aG1=94377FFaJtWV7g@mail.gmail.com> <52DA0ABA.8030903@acm.org> <CAKD1Yr1zSfAOv8j9XgB_ph9uaUUNW0yrJhfjJTsSTYHNKYNx9A@mail.gmail.com> <52E03BB4.8040309@acm.org> <DCA1F00D-0775-4030-A3BF-700F01F98C35@employees.org> <52E0423A.5070906@acm.org> <01DC3532-C73A-4644-A323-04BE6231AADA@employees.org> <52E9EF2D.9050402@acm.org> <2CFF305E-DE44-4D57-82D3-241196D94610@employees.org> <CAHw9_i+0DKS7pTFmRaajdX0=R9yhY7=6gXs2nV_vEKqEsz=d2Q@mail.gmail.com> <52ECA6EE.1080201@acm.org> <75B6FA9F576969419E42BECB86CB1B89115D182D@xmb-rcd-x06.cisco.com> <1315813580.259590.1392631505190.JavaMail.sas1@[172.29.252.247]> <75B6FA9F576969419E42BECB86CB1B89115E3B8D@xmb-rcd-x06.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <75B6FA9F576969419E42BECB86CB1B89115E3B8D@xmb-rcd-x06.cisco.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cw47LM5eEkCOMoJtCJHewXFrjhJggvgX0"
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (nagasaki.bogus.com [147.28.0.81]); Mon, 17 Feb 2014 16:00:21 +0000 (UTC)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/UKk6qWP6ZP8hZmQHeHSJ9Jcfh1k
Cc: 6man Chairs <6man-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, Andrew Yourtchenko <ayourtch@gmail.com>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, Erik Nordmark <nordmark@acm.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 16:00:39 -0000

On 2/17/14, 5:41 AM, Hemant Singh (shemant) wrote:
> Cisco IPR should not block this work.   There are several drafts in the IETF that are underway with IPR from Cisco and other companies. 

The participants address the question of IPR on per-draft basis.

> Hemant 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ek [mailto:ek@internetdraft.org] 
> Sent: Monday, February 17, 2014 5:05 AM
> To: Hemant Singh (shemant)
> Cc: Erik Nordmark; Warren Kumari; Ole Troan; 6man Chairs; 6man WG; Andrew Yourtchenko
> Subject: RE: Reducing the battery impact of ND
> 
>  > If the community is interested in supporting a new ethertype for IPv6 ND, please let me know.  I would expedite an I-D from Cisco who has IPR related to the new ethertype.  See  >  > http://www.google.com/patents/US8102854 
>  
> I haven't read this, but, IMHO, the potential existence of IPR about using a new ethertype for NUD messages is a wonderful reason to *never ever* do this.
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email