Re: Reducing the battery impact of ND

Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us> Wed, 05 February 2014 04:37 UTC

Return-Path: <dougb@dougbarton.us>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7948E1A0026 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 20:37:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.537
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.537 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uLxyOhHdmDB9 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 20:37:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dougbarton.us (dougbarton.us [208.79.90.218]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 923371A0024 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 20:37:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:d:5e7:f5ba:4b6d:93ee:711a] (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:d:5e7:f5ba:4b6d:93ee:711a]) by dougbarton.us (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0B92722B2A for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 04:37:35 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=dougbarton.us; s=dougbarton.us; t=1391575055; bh=kDevOQl7bq7dxz+T5oJV7vXIUOAfcMe62m1Z69CPoZ8=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=jBUx+UYIvimT7VCgqyfONAmH3QbH+fLQaBsZtMFLtwAcrNYhWigDzG2KclOyMUB70 hsniq8v6+drH1avOHFXF7hMpqA9cice0L5fmQUlpskPhglJ+3E+aGh+f9XX5uchmk5 GFplwX8/ZrPfh0GamhEdKbvfy7ElMIL9Zv8ZX6Sc=
Message-ID: <52F1C00E.2050508@dougbarton.us>
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 20:37:34 -0800
From: Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Reducing the battery impact of ND
References: <CAKD1Yr29S=O5L4DfhNoiVieWPkgBJ2veuOu6ig5rwgK4ELz7Xw@mail.gmail.com> <52D96663.6060005@sonic.net> <CAKD1Yr3pCQ15uFz36MvKG3Q_Vzt27ws0aG1=94377FFaJtWV7g@mail.gmail.com> <52DA0ABA.8030903@acm.org> <CAKD1Yr1zSfAOv8j9XgB_ph9uaUUNW0yrJhfjJTsSTYHNKYNx9A@mail.gmail.com> <52E03BB4.8040309@acm.org> <DCA1F00D-0775-4030-A3BF-700F01F98C35@employees.org>
In-Reply-To: <DCA1F00D-0775-4030-A3BF-700F01F98C35@employees.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 04:37:40 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 01/22/2014 01:57 PM, Ole Troan wrote:
| example: a host successfully does router discovery. RA lifetime is
relatively short, e.g. 3 * router advertisement interval.
| host doesn't receive any of the multicast RAs (network drops them or
whatever).
|
| what would be the best behaviour for the end-user?
| a) host sits quietly and waits for a periodic RA
| b) host restarts the initial router discovery

Clearly it's b, or was this a rhetorical question?

Doug

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJS8cAOAAoJEFzGhvEaGryEB2sH/30cuUQoJv0MXdl7V1w1gvzH
uZeGJWSApWOkxio4NYhtBsHnp1ICvi8z+xgIH2AVtR37eUXWZvmAFpLEm+jb2ikJ
tB9etB7IT0ou+pYexkYbYbA+MQZfKrLi4agi2lciu94wOU9KkUKtljvEFXpaCCZf
bZwEuNCpae74F1c+4M9NcXTy926OeDFfmkNa9HcfyKCnfJ0ubpdt5lpygQl/DmqV
7jQ9/z8IBVE3CDPm/lrEuyt5PgLGmXw+HtcXaTOnLFf3mfUUQ68JJZWGFbGhpTTg
eH84z2DLrpxfXs9YqR8+JoeJ+lT2f7kzGnjARrCUwfReavRNtnm4C2kYExhxxPk=
=K/3x
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----