IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Reducing the battery impact of ND

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Mon, 17 February 2014 16:22 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09F581A0512 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 08:22:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, LOTS_OF_MONEY=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V6AQXmGkBqAv for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 08:22:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wg0-f44.google.com (mail-wg0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10E161A03FC for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 08:22:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wg0-f44.google.com with SMTP id k14so2390069wgh.11 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 08:22:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=TuMhCqLHiXdQntcDevgMO2daCdLSLRAtHElhcSAe8L8=; b=QD/mQ1ngznrctKc568l1TtkYgtTiyA0oCgXgDEtCcHbXFc/tq29feCVUmr6fjP4zSJ aSQNZ7P7TdTDQR5fR8H5jllrCkVH6vZHqDi1Ka0higc6UWni7VTd0SkCXJeEW1IWMg77 U3K2TJYiv5qBchTEfRtAGOytYVTPxv91WlwSzvmbfql9gdEZp9Aayo/yva9YQFiYE2pv glEPWMjGCYrF0v+6IrSdJF0nslPytEQfTWMiTHPLnY8zELlGTSkQSHKsCppDJg5mVTgU kUSKiDUPp4+zif6DzPm1Qzk6IRcHbNdK3w6O68yIqgGrqtzwSiAC/WCW3t9Ex18YI+qw GeRQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQknpkBjssFVjjh82s3G43Dj+1ucUtj2JOyE+F0VBA040+0KObUKTGQaUP4aeICXopK9dZLp
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.98.35 with SMTP id ef3mr13937979wib.39.1392654159977; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 08:22:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.194.54.167 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 08:22:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Originating-IP: [98.244.98.35]
In-Reply-To: <75B6FA9F576969419E42BECB86CB1B89115E3B8D@xmb-rcd-x06.cisco.com>
References: <52D96663.6060005@sonic.net> <CAKD1Yr3pCQ15uFz36MvKG3Q_Vzt27ws0aG1=94377FFaJtWV7g@mail.gmail.com> <52DA0ABA.8030903@acm.org> <CAKD1Yr1zSfAOv8j9XgB_ph9uaUUNW0yrJhfjJTsSTYHNKYNx9A@mail.gmail.com> <52E03BB4.8040309@acm.org> <DCA1F00D-0775-4030-A3BF-700F01F98C35@employees.org> <52E0423A.5070906@acm.org> <01DC3532-C73A-4644-A323-04BE6231AADA@employees.org> <52E9EF2D.9050402@acm.org> <2CFF305E-DE44-4D57-82D3-241196D94610@employees.org> <CAHw9_i+0DKS7pTFmRaajdX0=R9yhY7=6gXs2nV_vEKqEsz=d2Q@mail.gmail.com> <52ECA6EE.1080201@acm.org> <75B6FA9F576969419E42BECB86CB1B89115D182D@xmb-rcd-x06.cisco.com> <1315813580.259590.1392631505190.JavaMail.sas1@172.29.252.247> <75B6FA9F576969419E42BECB86CB1B89115E3B8D@xmb-rcd-x06.cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 11:22:39 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iLeEZgq8hizVz6_5pEnS4PHgqRZ_rsOk8+45hmmRnn_TA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Reducing the battery impact of ND
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
To: "Hemant Singh (shemant)" <shemant@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/akKY0vlbXlXcTDaoIzjYqBE2Xzc
Cc: 6man Chairs <6man-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, Andrew Yourtchenko <ayourtch@gmail.com>, Erik Nordmark <nordmark@acm.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 16:22:55 -0000

On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 8:41 AM, Hemant Singh (shemant)
<shemant@cisco.com> wrote:
> Cisco IPR should not block this work.   There are several drafts in the IETF that are underway with IPR from Cisco and other companies.

Block? No. Make people concerned / less likely to implement? Yes.

>
> Hemant
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ek [mailto:ek@internetdraft.org]
> Sent: Monday, February 17, 2014 5:05 AM
> To: Hemant Singh (shemant)
> Cc: Erik Nordmark; Warren Kumari; Ole Troan; 6man Chairs; 6man WG; Andrew Yourtchenko
> Subject: RE: Reducing the battery impact of ND
>
>  > If the community is interested in supporting a new ethertype for IPv6 ND, please let me know.  I would expedite an I-D from Cisco who has IPR related to the new ethertype.  See  >  > http://www.google.com/patents/US8102854
>
> I haven't read this, but, IMHO, the potential existence of IPR about using a new ethertype for NUD messages is a wonderful reason to *never ever* do this.
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email