RE: Request to close the LC and move forward//RE: WGLC - draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming

<bruno.decraene@orange.com> Wed, 26 February 2020 14:37 UTC

Return-Path: <bruno.decraene@orange.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 474293A0806; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 06:37:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=orange.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id efPC4fyIhdRT; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 06:37:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relais-inet.orange.com (relais-inet.orange.com [80.12.66.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D1D03A07F8; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 06:37:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from opfedar02.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.4]) by opfedar22.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 48SJKf07Q4z2y3r; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 15:37:10 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=orange.com; s=ORANGE001; t=1582727830; bh=y3cVo+GvW0kqZeGOUMWqARk/ILnykMJR2alnMXZJkYs=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=YR+drepwFPQCr0++YJ2Y2Xj+R1RijCFec+4ZackGrjriOdmPkosvyC4woJSqv94qq pKqdI/YDkxIpy4dINjtkfJaDcBQBA9htTciUfoHPbvDMBXrO1eWssaG1B2qDNe8s9B oX7mfZV/f52hAOpIohYMxDRbM88hitmw56iC9ARp9pdgENOKOfuT3VCNwI6rxeQCBW 58fwJ3/OLQneFxmUmdwOo4CSwd59wuPFXc3MaXYW45Lu+tkkyN6uBkCyrMvKxIeSAz zjKv4Ja+ne3PH8iNO3e7upuaaJ3/bSZgoo56xbZb+F+7DlBKTazHd2GG0wQm6X1nI7 C0uxWDHyLQZow==
Received: from Exchangemail-eme6.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.13.48]) by opfedar02.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 48SJKd60TdzCqkg; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 15:37:09 +0100 (CET)
Received: from OPEXCAUBM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::b846:2467:1591:5d9d]) by OPEXCAUBM32.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::81c9:5f:b9c5:1241%21]) with mapi id 14.03.0468.000; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 15:37:09 +0100
From: <bruno.decraene@orange.com>
To: Lizhenbin <lizhenbin@huawei.com>
CC: "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming <draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming@ietf.org>, 'SPRING WG List' <spring@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: Request to close the LC and move forward//RE: WGLC - draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming
Thread-Topic: Request to close the LC and move forward//RE: WGLC - draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming
Thread-Index: AdXsmBuY1tqntXEdSECRXFRXLBEUfQAGBU6g
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 14:37:09 +0000
Message-ID: <4038_1582727829_5E568295_4038_168_1_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A48DB381A@OPEXCAUBM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <5A5B4DE12C0DAC44AF501CD9A2B01A8D9364A1C2@DGGEMM532-MBX.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <5A5B4DE12C0DAC44AF501CD9A2B01A8D9364A1C2@DGGEMM532-MBX.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.114.13.245]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A48DB381AOPEXCAUBM43corp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/YPOsXnA9llTbi50qnACnqymwZd4>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 14:37:17 -0000

Hi Robin,

I think that this was expected that this specific LC would last for more than 2 weeks.
Summarizing and closing it is on my to do list. (I wish my to do list were smaller, or that I throw more $$ or contributors on action items. But wishing does not help much in my world.)

That been said, this does not change much with regards to technical comments been raised:

-          They are either addressed, non-addressed or pending

-          they can be raised after the WG LC (e.g. during IETF LC or IESG review)

-          they can even be raised after RFC publication. And eventually can led to errata, bis document, deprecation...

So technical review and comments are good, at all time. (although sooner is better)

Best regards,
--Bruno

From: spring [mailto:spring-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lizhenbin
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2020 12:55 PM
To: DECRAENE Bruno TGI/OLN; 'SPRING WG List'
Cc: 6man@ietf.org; draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming
Subject: [spring] Request to close the LC and move forward//RE: WGLC - draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming

Hi Bruno and WG,
The LC has lasted for almost 3 months which greatly exceeds the expected 2 week. In the process all the comments have been resolved while some issues is raised again and again with little value.
On the other hand, there have been multiple commercial implementation and inter-op test and almost 20 deployments for SRv6 which justify the solution proposed by the draft in practice.

We sincerely request to close the LC of the draft and move forward.



Best Regards,
Zhenbin (Robin)


From: bruno.decraene@orange.com [mailto:bruno.decraene@orange.com]
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2019 1:15 AM
To: 'SPRING WG List' <spring@ietf.org>
Cc: 6man@ietf.org; draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming <draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming@ietf.org>
Subject: WGLC - draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming


Hello SPRING,



This email starts a two weeks Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming [1].



Please read this document if you haven't read the most recent version, and send your comments to the SPRING WG list, no later than December 20.



You may copy the 6MAN WG for IPv6 related comment, but consider not duplicating emails on the 6MAN mailing list for the comments which are only spring specifics.



If you are raising a point which you expect will be specifically debated on the mailing list, consider using a specific email/thread for this point.

This may help avoiding that the thread become specific to this point and that other points get forgotten (or that the thread get converted into parallel independent discussions)



Thank you,

Bruno



[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-05




_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________



Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc

pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler

a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,

Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.



This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;

they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.

If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.

As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.

Thank you.

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.