IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage usage

Leif Halvard Silli <lhs@malform.no> Mon, 26 May 2008 02:00 UTC

Return-Path: <ltru-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ltru-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ltru-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AB513A6978; Sun, 25 May 2008 19:00:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2D6E3A6978 for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 25 May 2008 19:00:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.71
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.71 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.111, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WfZJFDBoO3dN for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 25 May 2008 19:00:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lakepoint.domeneshop.no (lakepoint.domeneshop.no [194.63.248.54]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6E543A693F for <ltru@ietf.org>; Sun, 25 May 2008 19:00:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 10013.local (cm-84.208.108.246.getinternet.no [84.208.108.246]) (authenticated bits=0) by lakepoint.domeneshop.no (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m4Q20RDh022345; Mon, 26 May 2008 04:00:27 +0200
Message-ID: <483A19BC.1000106@malform.no>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 04:00:28 +0200
From: Leif Halvard Silli <lhs@malform.no>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.8.1b1) Gecko/20060724 Thunderbird/2.0a1 Mnenhy/0.7.4.666
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Peter Constable <petercon@microsoft.com>
References: <mailman.2658.1211631529.13675.ltru@ietf.org> <001b01c8bdc8$e2d66770$e6f5e547@DGBP7M81> <483955E8.1070603@malform.no> <004501c8beb2$6f343e10$e6f5e547@DGBP7M81> <483A0679.2010708@malform.no> <DDB6DE6E9D27DD478AE6D1BBBB83579562E2A40FFF@NA-EXMSG-C117.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <DDB6DE6E9D27DD478AE6D1BBBB83579562E2A40FFF@NA-EXMSG-C117.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Cc: LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage usage
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ltru-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

Peter Constable 2008-05-26 03.00:

>> From: ltru-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ltru-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
>> Leif Halvard Silli
> 
>> Whether we got 'nn' and 'nb' then or had "suddenly" gotten 'nob'
>> and 'nno' today was still not my point. The point was that a
>> macrolanguage tagging method would in fact be simpler for users to
>> understand.
> 

> Well, that's an interesting claim. I've got people (not on this
> list) claiming the opposite.


I guess this is what we are debating.
-- 
leif halvard silli
_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email