Re: [MMUSIC] Updating SDP parameter registry

[Flemming Andreasen <[e-mail]>]

On 10/6/13 11:28 PM, Christian Groves wrote:
> Hello Flemming,
>
> Thanks for pointing out that thread. If Paul as one of the SDP 
> directorate is OK with it then I don't have any issue with the -cs draft.
>
> I think though that the addresstype and nettype from RFC3108 still 
> needs to be picked up by the IANA registry.
>
Agreed.

-- Flemming

> Regards, Christian
>
> On 7/10/2013 12:38 PM, Flemming Andreasen wrote:
>> Hi Christian
>>
>> We had a thread on this particular issue about a year ago. See
>>
>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/current/msg09599.html
>>
>> and the conclusion in
>>
>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/current/msg09621.html
>>
>> I hope this addresses your concern as it relates to -cs draft.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> -- Flemming
>>
>>
>> On 9/19/13 8:22 AM, Christian Groves wrote:
>>> FYI, I was looking at the IANA registry for SDP parameters ( 
>>> http://www.iana.org/assignments/sdp-parameters/sdp-parameters.xhtml) 
>>> and noticed that there was a registration for addrtype E164 linked 
>>> to this CS draft.
>>>
>>> There's a problem that there's already an addrtype E164 in RFC3108. 
>>> This earlier usage of E164 should have been registered with IANA but 
>>> seems to have been missed. To complicate things the format of the 
>>> RFC3108 E164 addrtype is different to the one in the CS draft.
>>>
>>> I've already raised this with IANA but I thought it would be worth 
>>> mentioning in MMUSIC.
>>>
>>> Christian
>
> .
>