Re: [MMUSIC] Notes from Orlando human language draft discussion

On 2013-07-10 06:49, Christian Groves wrote:
> I wouldn't have thought that it would be use case specific... i.e. i'd 
> only include my language when I called an emergency service. I would 
> think an endpoint would be configured with the information and then 
> provide it whenever I made a call. Is that the intent?
>
> Christian
Yes, that is the intent.

And for both relay service invocation and any other assisting service 
invocation, it is best for the user to dial the destination, and get the 
assisting service invoked by an indication like this in the call, rather 
than being forced to first call an assisting service and with them 
discuss who is the final destination of the call.

The other party in the call may be another user, a call center, an 
emergency service or a conference bridge.

Gunnar

>
> On 10/07/2013 9:23 AM, Gunnar Hellstrom wrote:
>> On 2013-07-09 23:58, Randall Gellens wrote:
>>> This is a different, and more complex, scenario than what this 
>>> proposal is trying to solve.  This proposal is focused on simpler 
>>> cases where someone places an emergency call or calls a corporate 
>>> call center.  Possibly this can be just a simple case of the more 
>>> complex cases? 
>> My view is that it is intended to also cover user-to-user cases, 
>> where preferences are compared and a relay service (or language 
>> interpreter) can be invoked to bridge language gaps.
>>
>> Gunnar
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mmusic mailing list
>> mmusic@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> mmusic@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic