Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp-04.txt> (Encapsulating MPLS in UDP) to Proposed Standard

Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> Mon, 27 January 2014 18:53 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@isi.edu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FD461A02A4; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 10:53:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.735
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.735 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r85c620Ak3Vp; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 10:53:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vapor.isi.edu (vapor.isi.edu [128.9.64.64]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EF461A0239; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 10:53:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [128.9.160.166] (abc.isi.edu [128.9.160.166]) (authenticated bits=0) by vapor.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s0RIr9lx006196 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 27 Jan 2014 10:53:09 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <52E6AB15.2080907@isi.edu>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 10:53:09 -0800
From: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>, "stbryant@cisco.com" <stbryant@cisco.com>
References: <201401240320.s0O3KsR9013700@maildrop2.v6ds.occnc.com> <52E2BBC0.2030203@isi.edu> <52E68C12.2050308@cisco.com> <98034F7E-47CF-4ABE-A199-A9DB4DACBC2E@isi.edu> <52E6AA0B.1050600@bogus.com>
In-Reply-To: <52E6AA0B.1050600@bogus.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp-04.txt> (Encapsulating MPLS in UDP) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 18:53:54 -0000

On 1/27/2014 10:48 AM, joel jaeggli wrote:
> On 1/27/14, 8:48 AM, Joe Touch wrote:
>> Those same mechanisms have provided hardware checksum support for a very long time.
>
> The new header and the payload are actually in different parts of the
> forwarding complex until they hit the output queue, you can't checksum
> data you don't have.

You can (and some do) the checksum component parts when things go into 
memory; the partial sums can be added as the parts are combined in the 
output queue.

I appreciate that we're all taking about what might be done, but the 
reality is that there are many 'transparent TCP proxies' that have to do 
this, so there's clearly a solution, and it clearly runs fast enough.

Joe