IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp-04.txt> (Encapsulating MPLS in UDP) to Proposed Standard

<l.wood@surrey.ac.uk> Fri, 31 January 2014 11:34 UTC

Return-Path: <l.wood@surrey.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87FCE1A057D; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 03:34:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6jVwg-BqMVcg; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 03:34:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail1.bemta5.messagelabs.com (mail1.bemta5.messagelabs.com [195.245.231.141]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11FFB1A0590; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 03:34:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [85.158.136.51:7852] by server-5.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id 44/0D-32749-D3A8BE25; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 11:34:21 +0000
X-Env-Sender: l.wood@surrey.ac.uk
X-Msg-Ref: server-11.tower-49.messagelabs.com!1391168061!19463993!1
X-Originating-IP: [131.227.200.39]
X-StarScan-Received:
X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,-
X-VirusChecked: Checked
Received: (qmail 24193 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2014 11:34:21 -0000
Received: from exht012p.surrey.ac.uk (HELO EXHT012P.surrey.ac.uk) (131.227.200.39) by server-11.tower-49.messagelabs.com with AES128-SHA encrypted SMTP; 31 Jan 2014 11:34:21 -0000
Received: from EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk ([169.254.1.204]) by EXHT012P.surrey.ac.uk ([131.227.200.39]) with mapi; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 11:34:20 +0000
From: l.wood@surrey.ac.uk
To: stbryant@cisco.com, gdaley@au.logicalis.com, jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu, ietf@ietf.org, mpls@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 11:32:31 +0000
Thread-Topic: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp-04.txt> (Encapsulating MPLS in UDP) to Proposed Standard
Thread-Index: Ac8ecmlbdUqQeAUTQQSU8IsB6dbYxwABbdgM
Message-ID: <290E20B455C66743BE178C5C84F1240847E63346FE@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk>
References: <20140130193200.7BBD018C1C1@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> <72381AF1F18BAE4F890A0813768D992817FDAB19@sdcexchms.au.logicalis.com>, <52EB800E.2090102@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <52EB800E.2090102@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, en-GB
Content-Language: en-GB
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US, en-GB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp-04.txt> (Encapsulating MPLS in UDP) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 11:34:28 -0000

RFC 6773. which requires a full udp checksum for nat traversal.

Lloyd Wood
http://about.me/lloydwood
________________________________________
From: ietf [ietf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Stewart Bryant [stbryant@cisco.com]
Sent: 31 January 2014 10:50
To: Greg Daley; 'Noel Chiappa'; ietf@ietf.org; mpls@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp-04.txt> (Encapsulating MPLS in UDP) to Proposed Standard

On 30/01/2014 22:44, Greg Daley wrote:
> Of course, in order to get the protocols to pass legacy firewall
> inspection, UDP encapsulation may be required, and companies would
> have to actually implement the protocol... Greg Daley
> gdaley@au.logicalis.com
So UDP/DCCP/MPLS ?

Stewart

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email