IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp-04.txt> (Encapsulating MPLS in UDP) to Proposed Standard

Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com> Fri, 31 January 2014 10:51 UTC

Return-Path: <stbryant@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AA4A1A058B; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 02:51:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.036
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.036 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id odH1GPIMrj2I; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 02:51:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72D3C1A058A; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 02:51:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=297; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1391165458; x=1392375058; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=WLw1m40bAC4ADWAux+tfJOfXLMXnpv01Y7nByMDXTVs=; b=NNMLL+H7waam64l/J6PltDoG3LcnJoNtMhpn1x0ODr7Uf2ac5LrcIYA0 zZGwJ/2YRJ98jl+GnlJVYPdXPmkjvAz5uYwM4vkRDVN9rqNyJr7YFbvY+ F9/xPilQuqSdkRcKzDMcxuHqTspuvy1hxC7WXW8fgexP+wXsQKYa/rNKG s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgUFABZ/61KQ/khM/2dsb2JhbABZDoJ+vkWBBRZ0giUBAQEEOEARCw4KCRYECwkDAgECAUUGAQwGAgEBiAHNBBePCYQ4AQOUQoNohkiLWYFvfz8
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,757,1384300800"; d="scan'208";a="4468290"
Received: from ams-core-3.cisco.com ([144.254.72.76]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 31 Jan 2014 10:50:57 +0000
Received: from cisco.com (mrwint.cisco.com [64.103.70.36]) by ams-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s0VAouVv014647 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 31 Jan 2014 10:50:56 GMT
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cisco.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id s0VAosI7009570; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 10:50:55 GMT
Message-ID: <52EB800E.2090102@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 10:50:54 +0000
From: Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Greg Daley <gdaley@au.logicalis.com>, 'Noel Chiappa' <jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
References: <20140130193200.7BBD018C1C1@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> <72381AF1F18BAE4F890A0813768D992817FDAB19@sdcexchms.au.logicalis.com>
In-Reply-To: <72381AF1F18BAE4F890A0813768D992817FDAB19@sdcexchms.au.logicalis.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp-04.txt> (Encapsulating MPLS in UDP) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: stbryant@cisco.com
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 10:51:03 -0000

On 30/01/2014 22:44, Greg Daley wrote:
> Of course, in order to get the protocols to pass legacy firewall 
> inspection, UDP encapsulation may be required, and companies would 
> have to actually implement the protocol... Greg Daley 
> gdaley@au.logicalis.com 
So UDP/DCCP/MPLS ?

Stewart

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email