IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp-04.txt> (Encapsulating MPLS in UDP) to Proposed Standard

"Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com> Fri, 24 January 2014 08:02 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@netapp.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 724881A01D1 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 00:02:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.437
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.437 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BiiAW4xk2X7L for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 00:02:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx11.netapp.com (mx11.netapp.com [216.240.18.76]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9D531A01C6 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 00:02:41 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,711,1384329600"; d="scan'208";a="97848096"
Received: from vmwexceht02-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.106.76.240]) by mx11-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 24 Jan 2014 00:02:40 -0800
Received: from SACEXCMBX06-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([169.254.9.60]) by vmwexceht02-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.106.76.240]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 00:02:40 -0800
From: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
To: "curtis@ipv6.occnc.com" <curtis@ipv6.occnc.com>
Thread-Topic: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp-04.txt> (Encapsulating MPLS in UDP) to Proposed Standard
Thread-Index: AQHPGLxZFyKjVtdEy02x6qUpK40JLJqUCe8A
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 08:02:39 +0000
Message-ID: <78AE1B8C-AC1C-42D6-AF8B-129F7442836C@netapp.com>
References: <201401240425.s0O4PjO9014541@maildrop2.v6ds.occnc.com>
In-Reply-To: <201401240425.s0O4PjO9014541@maildrop2.v6ds.occnc.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.106.53.51]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <58718F792E071F47AE07DF2310907C90@hq.netapp.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp-04.txt> (Encapsulating MPLS in UDP) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 08:02:43 -0000

Curtis,

On 2014-1-24, at 5:25, Curtis Villamizar <curtis@ipv6.occnc.com> wrote:
> Help me out here Lloyd.  Previously on this thread Lars was vigorously
> arguing that we needed to follow years of IETF consensus about UDP
> checksums.

you must have me confused with someone else (there were a lot of messages.)

None of my emails on draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp even mentioned checksums.

Lars

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email