IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp-04.txt> (Encapsulating MPLS in UDP) to Proposed Standard

"Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com> Wed, 08 January 2014 10:21 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@netapp.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC3441AE1D2; Wed, 8 Jan 2014 02:21:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.44
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.44 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CX4kapA9sL_D; Wed, 8 Jan 2014 02:21:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx11.netapp.com (mx11.netapp.com [216.240.18.76]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A21701AE1D9; Wed, 8 Jan 2014 02:21:47 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.95,623,1384329600"; d="asc'?scan'208"; a="94680269"
Received: from vmwexceht03-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.106.76.241]) by mx11-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 08 Jan 2014 02:21:38 -0800
Received: from SACEXCMBX06-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([169.254.9.60]) by vmwexceht03-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.106.76.241]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Wed, 8 Jan 2014 02:21:38 -0800
From: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
To: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp-04.txt> (Encapsulating MPLS in UDP) to Proposed Standard
Thread-Index: AQHPB81hZzPPQlRcgk6ua2U45NfiYJp7LVMA
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 10:21:37 +0000
Message-ID: <5933BB7D-2D2D-4145-A0B2-E92C8DA25844@netapp.com>
References: <20140102151419.4692.48031.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140102151419.4692.48031.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.106.53.51]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_36C4746D-8644-40AC-AC97-DAF2E1204EE1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 09:15:22 -0800
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp-04.txt> (Encapsulating MPLS in UDP) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 10:21:50 -0000

Hi,

On 2014-1-2, at 16:14, The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> wrote:
> - 'Encapsulating MPLS in UDP'
>  <draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp-04.txt> as Proposed Standard


this document needs to describe how it addresses the issues raised in BCP145 (RFC5405). It already contains some text about messages sizes and congestion considerations, which is great. Unfortunately, the text about congestion considerations is not fully in line with RFC5405.

Lars

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email