Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp-04.txt> (Encapsulating MPLS in UDP) to Proposed Standard

Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com> Tue, 21 January 2014 11:50 UTC

Return-Path: <stbryant@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E1601A009A for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 03:50:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.036
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.036 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F2gP8ptHjUvV for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 03:50:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB6C01A0061 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 03:50:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=260; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1390305055; x=1391514655; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8END1lBHfte59BHDDtZxm/D3Its2pY1iNPJg1lpfE4k=; b=UoTXB1UKOWby+UTaMaHZpW1Ljx0ZEezG2yoM428LvsUSH4j41yW3WywI y+FJ8Cjz9+jlvB3meQEpvgU8/EnoCyBdbZ0enM6fkUtFW1PK4RcqUSlQf Ms6VasnjCfkG+Pj3ExVixH9YOi0Y/UwKbmL3+srWuqwz2HQIETe6c4rcl A=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ag0FAONe3lKQ/khM/2dsb2JhbABZDoJ9vHSBExZ0giYBAQQ4QAEQCyEWBAsJAwIBAgFFBwwBBwEBiAHECReOfweEOAEDmCKSGIFvfz8
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,696,1384300800"; d="scan'208";a="3272367"
Received: from ams-core-3.cisco.com ([144.254.72.76]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 21 Jan 2014 11:50:54 +0000
Received: from cisco.com (mrwint.cisco.com [64.103.70.36]) by ams-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s0LBorLr024563 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 21 Jan 2014 11:50:54 GMT
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cisco.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id s0LBonpc014129; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 11:50:49 GMT
Message-ID: <52DE5F19.1060907@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 11:50:49 +0000
From: Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: l.wood@surrey.ac.uk, curtis@ipv6.occnc.com
References: Your message of "Fri, 17 Jan 2014 23:00:33 +0000." <290E20B455C66743BE178C5C84F1240847E63346D1@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk>, <201401202247.s0KMllSl047284@maildrop2.v6ds.occnc.com> <290E20B455C66743BE178C5C84F1240847E63346D6@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <290E20B455C66743BE178C5C84F1240847E63346D6@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: joelja@bogus.com, mpls@ietf.org, lars@netapp.com
Subject: Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp-04.txt> (Encapsulating MPLS in UDP) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: stbryant@cisco.com
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 11:50:56 -0000

Removing IETF from this lists

In terms of congestion and misdelivery it is interesting looking
at the number of horses that are already bounding around
in the paddock outside the stable:

IP types: 47 (GRE) and 137 (MPLS-in-IP) for example.

Stewart