IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to adopt two document (mpls-static and mpls-base)

"Tarek Saad (tsaad)" <tsaad@cisco.com> Thu, 19 May 2016 17:13 UTC

Return-Path: <tsaad@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F056F12D5DD; Thu, 19 May 2016 10:13:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.947
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.947 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FromCg13dMS8; Thu, 19 May 2016 10:13:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE5B812D5DC; Thu, 19 May 2016 10:12:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1396; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1463677974; x=1464887574; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=MBlUt6Xp7K8MmNzQf7eI3J9+H+IUcUkj6oo5H06mev8=; b=FYnKdbNdBSJ25Hh8ii+5rutd+X0jDgKTswgD+Ib7htDq07V0GFdkFOjd KieV4ntiNBXFR1HW46JixG5iXaWn6qZxKJOZSt2NCWLTSDnflzuAUO62/ kJZvYT+1BYSjP4rsUKwMMGRTfyof7whwuyNHBmCeV1wZf70D9hF4nMVfj o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ApAgA+8z1X/4gNJK1egzeBVAa6BAENgXWFAYEQAhyBHjgUAQEBAQEBAWUnhEMBAQQjETcDCw4CAgEIGgImAgICGRcVEAIEAQ0FiC+yTpFlAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBHAV8hSSBdoJXhBERARwXgmkrghIcAQSYMQGOH4FphE+IYo9IAR4BAUKCOIE1boZRNgF+AQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,334,1459814400"; d="scan'208";a="104358604"
Received: from alln-core-3.cisco.com ([173.36.13.136]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 19 May 2016 17:12:53 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-003.cisco.com (xch-rtp-003.cisco.com [64.101.220.143]) by alln-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u4JHCr1g007221 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 19 May 2016 17:12:53 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.220.141) by XCH-RTP-003.cisco.com (64.101.220.143) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Thu, 19 May 2016 13:12:52 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-001.cisco.com ([64.101.220.141]) by XCH-RTP-001.cisco.com ([64.101.220.141]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Thu, 19 May 2016 13:12:52 -0400
From: "Tarek Saad (tsaad)" <tsaad@cisco.com>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: poll to see if we have consensus to adopt two document (mpls-static and mpls-base)
Thread-Index: AQHRsOxEZh+i772AiESiBYK3M8sqcp/AgX8A
Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 17:12:52 +0000
Message-ID: <59AEAAE6-D64E-47FA-94D1-1AF47030BD41@cisco.com>
References: <729f6a0b-6222-7100-3b79-2291870d4421@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <729f6a0b-6222-7100-3b79-2291870d4421@pi.nu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.16.0.160506
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [161.44.213.98]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <B1416863ED754E43B8C45E8C55F97E70@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/EoVhppHH1yPR-bdCk9BsO-opiGw>
Cc: "draft-saad-mpls-base-yang@ietf.org" <draft-saad-mpls-base-yang@ietf.org>, "draft-saad-mpls-static-yang@ietf.org" <draft-saad-mpls-static-yang@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to adopt two document (mpls-static and mpls-base)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 17:13:03 -0000

Support this work (as co-author).

Regards,
Tarek

On 2016-05-18, 6:01 AM, "Loa Andersson" <loa@pi.nu> wrote:

>
>Working Group,
>
>This is to start a two week poll on adopting draft-saad-mpls-static-
>yang-03 and draft-saad-mpls-base-yang-00 as MPLS working group
>documents.
>
>Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working
>group mailing list (mpls@ietf.org). Please give a technical
>motivation for your support/not support, especially if you think that
>the document should not be adopted as a working group document.
>
>There are no IPR disclosures against either document. An IPR poll has
>been started in parallel to this adoption poll
>
>The working group adoption poll ends June 2, 2016, given that the IPR
>poll has concluded.
>
>/Loa
>
>MPLS wg co-chair.
>-- 
>
>
>Loa Andersson                        email: loa@mail01.huawei.com
>Senior MPLS Expert                          loa@pi.nu
>Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: +46 739 81 21 64

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email