IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to adopt two document (mpls-static and mpls-base)

"Xufeng Liu" <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 19 May 2016 20:02 UTC

Return-Path: <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 515BC12DC05; Thu, 19 May 2016 13:02:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W3POtQEoS6MO; Thu, 19 May 2016 13:02:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x233.google.com (mail-wm0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89E0812D698; Thu, 19 May 2016 13:02:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x233.google.com with SMTP id n129so51921756wmn.1; Thu, 19 May 2016 13:02:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=EcrF9aUtLEqvLVLMIO5rMzZPpF0XxIl7vFIdOtBLPks=; b=C6kwnprVqRxyqVQWJ1i7aIxJ8BtT6sQhJlgf++q7gZ5VQcpNIx0wpjbdH+bsmJiuIe XzNXtZJt2VWBLDGx06OwSKmsq2jqNrZbj8mMfklNjSfskv080P1quTznoH2G12/Mak0o 2lasvBXf7wn5p4oN9LI4OtsCGtWc48rJZNE7Bl1KTcsHy3qwwAAQIqIruIjNWeMM+qVz l4igUJykfSRajkmw7Q0+VitgkyVLD7iobtHR/B7r+qW5wsahSPVqcaZ17qGiNbVhoP3X dSd21BqtPcW+OBdp/Er8+Z068nz9NHnX7n3DzkzXwHjb0vnzvRCm74llN5B8Y8sq2iJL zJqQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=EcrF9aUtLEqvLVLMIO5rMzZPpF0XxIl7vFIdOtBLPks=; b=L7T4L0ZSsnO57aYOyDY84PGvg51QMDc6gudxqsooo3lbfhoii6tdn2ffGckUg4FEgT g4f0fR9LAfFAUVO+Oa06l3QVUQc23MLfbPnOFnXBCLKOcSD2luz6Pt/jcooyM4rzwWkZ l/ssaHiUJ1oG+uu1nuItO2+/TZx9E5rlYzKVLE3+mt/w7spP1Z/M9K16uOYs9J2wEsnh Te4TnGNHtXdAhZGMtcIwF0KGQF236SvoSx6iAYFXQjNMAqXxAKS6tQvc9GBKkM7pOjUP 9Cr4VoSfKSwpt7iELEKDhzMXlVpYNtyr5FYonzra30bI9Mut0FQC2bH8vNAzcKHeJhg0 2mig==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FXvrl2WG2S1CE+AkNSTcq/vQlOvbUzQCNamK0Oqc79vF2wq6Z5fB5KYGxV/WPrMQg==
X-Received: by 10.28.24.82 with SMTP id 79mr39925940wmy.42.1463688139166; Thu, 19 May 2016 13:02:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xliuus (wsip-98-191-72-170.dc.dc.cox.net. [98.191.72.170]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c85sm4771022wmd.0.2016.05.19.13.02.17 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 19 May 2016 13:02:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: Xufeng Liu <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com>
To: 'Loa Andersson' <loa@pi.nu>, mpls@ietf.org
References: <729f6a0b-6222-7100-3b79-2291870d4421@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <729f6a0b-6222-7100-3b79-2291870d4421@pi.nu>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 16:02:16 -0400
Message-ID: <052c01d1b209$58d57910$0a806b30$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQFTmj+72ChCowrrJU3GJtBEZ8tUEaC83d6g
Content-Language: en-us
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/Sus38dofwOQSEq-z4WXDRR_NvDg>
Cc: draft-saad-mpls-base-yang@ietf.org, draft-saad-mpls-static-yang@ietf.org, mpls-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to adopt two document (mpls-static and mpls-base)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 20:02:22 -0000

Support both (as co-author).

Thanks,

- Xufeng

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Loa Andersson [mailto:loa@pi.nu]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 6:01 AM
> To: mpls@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-saad-mpls-base-yang@ietf.org; draft-saad-mpls-static-yang@ietf.org;
> mpls-chairs@ietf.org
> Subject: poll to see if we have consensus to adopt two document (mpls-static
> and mpls-base)
> 
> 
> Working Group,
> 
> This is to start a two week poll on adopting draft-saad-mpls-static-
> yang-03 and draft-saad-mpls-base-yang-00 as MPLS working group documents.
> 
> Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working group
> mailing list (mpls@ietf.org). Please give a technical motivation for your
> support/not support, especially if you think that the document should not be
> adopted as a working group document.
> 
> There are no IPR disclosures against either document. An IPR poll has been
> started in parallel to this adoption poll
> 
> The working group adoption poll ends June 2, 2016, given that the IPR poll has
> concluded.
> 
> /Loa
> 
> MPLS wg co-chair.
> --
> 
> 
> Loa Andersson                        email: loa@mail01.huawei.com
> Senior MPLS Expert                          loa@pi.nu
> Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: +46 739 81 21 64

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email