Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to adopt two document (mpls-static and mpls-base)
Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com> Thu, 26 May 2016 04:00 UTC
Return-Path: <mach.chen@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAD0812D161; Wed, 25 May 2016 21:00:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.647
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.647 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BNGuDXOsLZzK; Wed, 25 May 2016 21:00:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6915712D15C; Wed, 25 May 2016 21:00:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml705-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CPP55125; Thu, 26 May 2016 04:00:24 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from SZXEMA417-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.72.34) by lhreml705-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.168) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Thu, 26 May 2016 05:00:23 +0100
Received: from SZXEMA510-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.3.42]) by SZXEMA417-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.82.72.34]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Thu, 26 May 2016 12:00:17 +0800
From: Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to adopt two document (mpls-static and mpls-base)
Thread-Index: AQHRsOxQtI//Ic73HkqqSwFJ2qoHAZ/Ko+9g
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 04:00:16 +0000
Message-ID: <F73A3CB31E8BE34FA1BBE3C8F0CB2AE28CC6F936@SZXEMA510-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <729f6a0b-6222-7100-3b79-2291870d4421@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <729f6a0b-6222-7100-3b79-2291870d4421@pi.nu>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.111.102.135]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A090205.574674D8.01F3, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.3.42, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 5c69953500f31a0fee897c9d6ead0daf
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/kL22EQ8ZgxtxN8nVCpTmU9cBkvU>
Cc: "draft-saad-mpls-base-yang@ietf.org" <draft-saad-mpls-base-yang@ietf.org>, "draft-saad-mpls-static-yang@ietf.org" <draft-saad-mpls-static-yang@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to adopt two document (mpls-static and mpls-base)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 04:00:30 -0000
I have read the document and support the adoption of it. Best regards, Mach > -----Original Message----- > From: mpls [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Loa Andersson > Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 6:01 PM > To: mpls@ietf.org > Cc: draft-saad-mpls-base-yang@ietf.org; draft-saad-mpls-static-yang@ietf.org; > mpls-chairs@ietf.org > Subject: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to adopt two document > (mpls-static and mpls-base) > > > Working Group, > > This is to start a two week poll on adopting draft-saad-mpls-static- > yang-03 and draft-saad-mpls-base-yang-00 as MPLS working group documents. > > Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working group > mailing list (mpls@ietf.org) Please give a technical motivation for your > support/not support, especially if you think that the document should not be > adopted as a working group document. > > There are no IPR disclosures against either document. An IPR poll has been > started in parallel to this adoption poll > > The working group adoption poll ends June 2, 2016, given that the IPR poll has > concluded. > > /Loa > > MPLS wg co-chair. > -- > > > Loa Andersson email: loa@mail01.huawei.com > Senior MPLS Expert loa@pi.nu > Huawei Technologies (consultant) phone: +46 739 81 21 64 > > _______________________________________________ > mpls mailing list > mpls@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
- [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to adopt … Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
- [mpls] 答复: poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Chenxia (D)
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Tarek Saad (tsaad)
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Zafar Ali (zali)
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Shah, Himanshu
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Wen, Bin
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Xufeng Liu
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Vishnu Pavan Beeram
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Mach Chen
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Raqib Jones
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Igor Bryskin
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Huub van Helvoort
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Santosh Esale
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Loa Andersson