IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ntp] Quick review of WGLC for status change for draft-ietf-ntp-update-registries

Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com> Mon, 15 August 2022 10:57 UTC

Return-Path: <mlichvar@redhat.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2416CC14CF08 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 03:57:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.677
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.677 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.571, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X8T_OmpJCR3B for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 03:57:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0417DC1522A6 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 03:57:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1660561043; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=yTOpFedDfFUmvJhBfF96ttjR2S/pTDlHsozljWB+Cb0=; b=LFD8L7JVkpbHxUZbUYMTxSfs25vBjJIFbndEupigeSM1EvDzAx7wYu+vbB5kNa7AFyPnO0 Rv4QV1lB+6uFheM9iqyc5LwJzMCInzC/llG3h+y6Uqtvrb4uLE22UM108RJzm2chLpdlkr kRt9BWsQ23AUO1JW2ex/VJyW2rQrXEk=
Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-433-RR07f2sYPcCR6Je2madIvw-1; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 06:57:19 -0400
X-MC-Unique: RR07f2sYPcCR6Je2madIvw-1
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CD00811E76; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 10:57:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (unknown [10.43.135.229]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5026492CA5; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 10:57:16 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 12:57:15 +0200
From: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com>
To: Danny Mayer <mayer@pdmconsulting.net>
Cc: Harlan Stenn <stenn@nwtime.org>, ntp@ietf.org
Message-ID: <Yvomi1Y5hWhPi8Av@localhost>
References: <PH0PR06MB706126984E4442EF32F8242AC2999@PH0PR06MB7061.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> <da155c84-2c70-2e3b-59eb-03e380806cf2@nwtime.org> <PH0PR06MB70611F2331D8255F7E2B6604C2999@PH0PR06MB7061.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> <0b4c7efa-3977-b588-0974-33b6a9437e52@nwtime.org> <YvDWC27qKnODlD52@localhost> <0b57b7db-772e-f5e6-e6a0-a433673f3d77@nwtime.org> <YvED7T5R0UsRWbv3@localhost> <b64c6a0a-ea2e-0a19-4bb9-38bfaa2e5032@nwtime.org> <YvIUIu1LaloEjJMb@localhost> <a500eea8-e6a1-c10f-2385-3a05fb0e9638@pdmconsulting.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <a500eea8-e6a1-c10f-2385-3a05fb0e9638@pdmconsulting.net>
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.85 on 10.11.54.9
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/Ae2yegxGKnffOv-iQIKPSblsdzc>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] Quick review of WGLC for status change for draft-ietf-ntp-update-registries
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Time Protocol <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 10:57:27 -0000

On Sun, Aug 14, 2022 at 01:55:09PM -0400, Danny Mayer wrote:
> On 8/9/22 4:00 AM, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> > The value was chosen by the first NTS implementation. As the Autokey
> > values used by ntpd were not documented anywhere, we didn't realize
> > there was a conflict until it was too late.
> 
> Are you saying that noone looked at RFC 5906 Section 13 IANA Consideration?
> 
> It took me 3 months working with Dave Mills to get that done. It should have
> been in the IANA registry.

The IANA registry includes the values from RFC 5906, which nobody is
using. ntpd is using its own values. That's one of the issues that the
draft in the subject is supposed to address.

-- 
Miroslav Lichvar

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email