IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: Quick review of WGLC for status change for draft‑ietf‑ntp‑update‑registries

Ulrich Windl <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de> Wed, 17 August 2022 07:15 UTC

Return-Path: <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FA12C14CE3A for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 00:15:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XtFWVX1u3JUb for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 00:15:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx2.uni-regensburg.de (mx2.uni-regensburg.de [IPv6:2001:638:a05:137:165:0:3:bdf8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 505AFC14CE2F for <ntp@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 00:15:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx2.uni-regensburg.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id AB861600006B for <ntp@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 09:15:08 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de (gwsmtp1.uni-regensburg.de [132.199.5.51]) by mx2.uni-regensburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 631EC600006A for <ntp@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 09:15:08 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from uni-regensburg-smtp1-MTA by gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de with Novell_GroupWise; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 09:15:08 +0200
Message-Id: <62FC957A020000A10004C61F@gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 18.4.1
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 09:15:06 +0200
From: Ulrich Windl <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>
To: mayer@pdmconsulting.net, mlichvar@redhat.com
Cc: "ntp@ietf.org" <ntp@ietf.org>, stenn@nwtime.org
References: <PH0PR06MB70611F2331D8255F7E2B6604C2999@PH0PR06MB7061.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> <0b4c7efa-3977-b588-0974-33b6a9437e52@nwtime.org> <YvDWC27qKnODlD52@localhost> <0b57b7db-772e-f5e6-e6a0-a433673f3d77@nwtime.org> <YvED7T5R0UsRWbv3@localhost> <b64c6a0a-ea2e-0a19-4bb9-38bfaa2e5032@nwtime.org> <YvIUIu1LaloEjJMb@localhost> <a500eea8-e6a1-c10f-2385-3a05fb0e9638@pdmconsulting.net> <Yvomi1Y5hWhPi8Av@localhost> <4723f2b2-43b0-a9ee-4d80-6e31d74b9d3a@pdmconsulting.net> <YvtBSLkHF1JpGH07@localhost> <dfeccb6c-b7cf-0873-5688-11c251a0569b@pdmconsulting.net> <53EE5BA5020000906A6A8CFC@gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de> <AAE09189020000265AEBDC6A@gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de> <48118AE7020000526A6A8CFC@gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de> <94128F03020000385AEBDC6A@gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de>
In-Reply-To: <94128F03020000385AEBDC6A@gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/ExvQZpBT9LX9KPyG5LndoFzVQ9I>
Subject: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: Quick review of WGLC for status change for draft‑ietf‑ntp‑update‑registries
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Time Protocol <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 07:15:15 -0000

>>> Danny Mayer <mayer@pdmconsulting.net> schrieb am 16.08.2022 um 18:05 in
Nachricht <dfeccb6c-b7cf-0873-5688-11c251a0569b@pdmconsulting.net>:

...
> I had a conversation with Harlan about this. It turns out that the 
> Autokey version currently implemented in the ntpd reference 
> implementation is using what is called a v1 version of the extension 
> field while RFC5906 is documenting the v2 version of the extension 
> field. I was not aware of this when I put it into the draft of RFC5906. 
> Dave Mills never mentioned that to me. My apologies for that.

I had noticed it when trying to teach tcpdump to decode the fields according to the description in the RFC.

> 
> Danny
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ntp mailing list
> ntp@ietf.org 
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email