IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: Quick review of WGLC for status change for draft‑ietf‑ntp‑update‑registries

Ulrich Windl <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de> Fri, 12 August 2022 09:28 UTC

Return-Path: <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F470C13C506 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Aug 2022 02:28:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wdt9DFpzgjVC for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Aug 2022 02:28:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx2.uni-regensburg.de (mx2.uni-regensburg.de [IPv6:2001:638:a05:137:165:0:3:bdf8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90E26C15C50A for <ntp@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Aug 2022 02:28:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx2.uni-regensburg.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 3DCAB600004E for <ntp@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Aug 2022 11:28:44 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de (gwsmtp1.uni-regensburg.de [132.199.5.51]) by mx2.uni-regensburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 340246000047 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Aug 2022 11:28:43 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from uni-regensburg-smtp1-MTA by gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de with Novell_GroupWise; Fri, 12 Aug 2022 11:28:43 +0200
Message-Id: <62F61D4A020000A10004C4C0@gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 18.4.1
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2022 11:28:42 +0200
From: Ulrich Windl <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>
To: Rich Salz <rsalz@akamai.com>, stenn@nwtime.org, mlichvar@redhat.com
Cc: "ntp@ietf.org" <ntp@ietf.org>
References: <PH0PR06MB7061FA7A5B338D262B3A2963C2999@PH0PR06MB7061.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> <6a187a2f-9883-2fb5-1f51-1593591ddebb@nwtime.org> <PH0PR06MB706126984E4442EF32F8242AC2999@PH0PR06MB7061.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> <da155c84-2c70-2e3b-59eb-03e380806cf2@nwtime.org> <PH0PR06MB70611F2331D8255F7E2B6604C2999@PH0PR06MB7061.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> <0b4c7efa-3977-b588-0974-33b6a9437e52@nwtime.org> <YvDWC27qKnODlD52@localhost> <0b57b7db-772e-f5e6-e6a0-a433673f3d77@nwtime.org> <YvED7T5R0UsRWbv3@localhost> <b64c6a0a-ea2e-0a19-4bb9-38bfaa2e5032@nwtime.org> <656D355F-E06A-4005-B9D6-90885FA8509D@akamai.com> <1a4bae28-f0f3-e675-899a-bad597b4ee29@nwtime.org> <F74A7B5B-3D77-42AF-BD7E-1A874CCD2D66@akamai.com> <67545c9a-3291-bbe6-c876-4c762c80c710@nwtime.org>
In-Reply-To: <67545c9a-3291-bbe6-c876-4c762c80c710@nwtime.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/bLXPIuaPqtdsOb73A5mu_iBXmR4>
Subject: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: Quick review of WGLC for status change for draft‑ietf‑ntp‑update‑registries
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Time Protocol <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2022 09:28:56 -0000

>>> Harlan Stenn <stenn@nwtime.org> schrieb am 12.08.2022 um 10:24 in
Nachricht
<67545c9a-3291-bbe6-c876-4c762c80c710@nwtime.org>:
> On 8/11/2022 11:26 AM, Salz, Rich wrote:

...
> I would be REALLY happy if the folks who think NTP should be taken in 
> backward‑incompatible directions and be driven by rough consensus would 
> start a new WG and use a new port and come up with their results in a 
> way that didn't destroy the existing NTP framework.

If you are honest, you must admit that NTP was not designed to be extensible.
RFC 958 does not even define a protocol version, and NTPv1 already broke
compatibility.

 0 1 2 3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|LI | Status | Type | Precision |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

vs.
 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|LI | VN  |0 0 0|    Stratum    |      Poll     |   Precision   |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Regards,
Ulrich

> 
> ‑‑ 
> Harlan Stenn <stenn@nwtime.org>
> http://networktimefoundation.org ‑ be a member!
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ntp mailing list
> ntp@ietf.org 
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email