IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ntp] Quick review of WGLC for status change for draft-ietf-ntp-update-registries

Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se> Fri, 12 August 2022 09:01 UTC

Return-Path: <leifj@mnt.se>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 038D7C15948C for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Aug 2022 02:01:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.907
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnt-se.20210112.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j_ngUr3xXZTr for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Aug 2022 02:01:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x234.google.com (mail-lj1-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::234]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3235FC157B5F for <ntp@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Aug 2022 02:01:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x234.google.com with SMTP id x25so336500ljm.5 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Aug 2022 02:01:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnt-se.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=to:in-reply-to:cc:references:message-id:date:subject:mime-version :from:content-transfer-encoding:from:to:cc; bh=xkFH2EJmUu3pW2DkrIkpFHOneumiCjRcvtB+aoZydO8=; b=7+3v8DJLckAqfK+IFtIF0XMPRMb7g4RKqchpe3ntqkXFYzk/mohrOnafcaOHrB9hQh 89Hqci2QJPA5D3LVA1mh6ChCg2WUdfYfrcEiGudz88rvXo6w1UJVZ8viLDIu5BmMJ9eq oNpMEwV3LtaTp+fks7Tr47GcdacWo5GpBZqLOhTz77oL6B+pgJsqE8xzblL68VSNELVA ol9MfBkKF1PiwtJAa96x6Gcn4z/p7TL3I3CtJctFU5lUhE/EO2DYTHiA4COGHfQ7s9lX /QHAeOap7zDzFNhZqZEpPMf2Ell+huOELFrfzeLjBXmMKheY2wETQvFp7XOuhzos3xws 66+w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:in-reply-to:cc:references:message-id:date:subject:mime-version :from:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=xkFH2EJmUu3pW2DkrIkpFHOneumiCjRcvtB+aoZydO8=; b=1fmlmXkmeTH0qvoUfGnszMkSrAzlLvlY3oQlQON03msz6vK3JWOsc+auaUnN1jVfQV ri7XGMywRk89JpE17YMea8wW16srEyPdmSQjhPrIZYmOjj+5lXoAwUWJKIsW43mGIc1k hEhEH5dKiMHwkFfOTpNUHnzNQ+jA8tY7ctFTRplYvH8aAfiS3UeMXJLAkMefRj+WTKX4 8aMjzfhMOj7EBMur9KBUSzf2UZwg7g3/olIukKTn5IJBQNg3XC+MsdfSacFRux3573N/ zMQITEt4gyYoqs3pPgxR6EEnEL6wQV6EabbmBbEX6sOhB2owT3xZvEwXikR18bu4RehF bfzg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo3WUksAk9cIFK7cmDUaft4CAq1Y+QqgFN0J+j/ho8WuXXd7aamT OXe9iLxBRXY0Q80oXppYMwJIIQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR5sfpLeKdYe1uaROc4q6DvY5fbVR0jGXV14FC84We+YArrjTdogY47XCEbtmaG1FOt4Wh9f/w==
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8019:0:b0:25e:4ff3:f4a3 with SMTP id j25-20020a2e8019000000b0025e4ff3f4a3mr863220ljg.508.1660294872928; Fri, 12 Aug 2022 02:01:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (h-82-196-111-181.NA.cust.bahnhof.se. [82.196.111.181]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c1-20020a056512074100b0048b120ba622sm144812lfs.81.2022.08.12.02.01.12 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 12 Aug 2022 02:01:12 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2022 11:01:12 +0200
Message-Id: <3F87A35A-A072-4ECC-94DA-BE9BA32B5CFD@mnt.se>
References: <67545c9a-3291-bbe6-c876-4c762c80c710@nwtime.org>
Cc: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com>, ntp@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <67545c9a-3291-bbe6-c876-4c762c80c710@nwtime.org>
To: Harlan Stenn <stenn@nwtime.org>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (19G71)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/ofQAai6RGtvGjsR8hyQnL5Yqd-g>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] Quick review of WGLC for status change for draft-ietf-ntp-update-registries
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Time Protocol <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2022 09:01:17 -0000

> 
> Most disturbing.
> 
> Does anybody really think rough consensus will produce a high-quality result?

Since rough consensus and running code is THE central tenet of the IETF I’d say you are not only in the rough here but not even in the same zip-code as the fairway.

Cheers Leif

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email