IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [RAI] Global Service Provider ID - draft-pfautz-service-provider-identifier-urn-01

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Thu, 29 September 2011 21:56 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: rai@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rai@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D83C21F8ED0 for <rai@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 14:56:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.357
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.357 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.243, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id arSAnpd1PAkH for <rai@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 14:56:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A07C021F8ECE for <rai@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 14:56:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dn3-228.estacado.net (vicuna-alt.estacado.net [75.53.54.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p8TLx0XI041576 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 29 Sep 2011 16:59:00 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
Message-ID: <4E84EA24.5060308@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 16:59:00 -0500
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/6.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Michael Hammer <mphmmr@gmail.com>
References: <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B222B1F590A@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com> <CAA62EE0.3B275%jason_livingood@cable.comcast.com> <38726EDA2109264987B45E29E758C4D6022C0F@MISOUT7MSGUSR9N.ITServices.sbc.com> <00ab01cc7d31$2cfa1c40$86ee54c0$@us> <4E820778.1070807@softarmor.com> <EDC0A1AE77C57744B664A310A0B23AE220CE44FF@FRMRSSXCHMBSC3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com> <D74629EC-D802-4A33-82AE-DA2A76EA5996@bbn.com> <4E82832E.3090600@nostrum.com> <009501cc7e1d$124b0700$36e11500$@us> <4E83BBD9.2070600@softarmor.com> <38726EDA2109264987B45E29E758C4D6023489@MISOUT7MSGUSR9N.ITServices.sbc.com> <CAA3wLqUT8pDABY6gX_WUj1w9ixN-afEzs50Wv8W6WqR9ePF9xA@mail.gmail.com> <38726EDA2109264987B45E29E758C4D6023509@MISOUT7MSGUSR9N.ITServices.sbc.com> <CAA3wLqUET08z+8mgEykf9FJJUB_gC858tZ8xT6tA-cG4s8fmjA@mail.gmail.com> <FCF1C337-4332-489F-BA83-1C8816DF889C@acmepacket.com> <CAA3wLqXpsQGjCncxoks4xqgB8KDb59TqXMNT-3SAk3B2=OLK0Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAA3wLqXpsQGjCncxoks4xqgB8KDb59TqXMNT-3SAk3B2=OLK0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: pass (nostrum.com: 75.53.54.121 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
Cc: "rai@ietf.org" <rai@ietf.org>, Dean Willis <dean.willis@softarmor.com>
Subject: Re: [RAI] Global Service Provider ID - draft-pfautz-service-provider-identifier-urn-01
X-BeenThere: rai@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Real-time Applications and Infrastructure \(RAI\)" <rai.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rai>, <mailto:rai-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rai>
List-Post: <mailto:rai@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rai-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rai>, <mailto:rai-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 21:56:11 -0000

On 9/29/11 4:32 PM, Michael Hammer wrote:
> Hadriel,
> Right, and no one would ever need more than 4 billion IP addresses.

FWIW, we're using nowhere near that many. The current exhaustion is due 
to the issuing of IP addresses in blocks. That doesn't happen with ITADs.

/a

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email