Re: [RAI] Global Service Provider ID - draft-pfautz-service-provider-identifier-urn-01

Dean Willis <dean.willis@softarmor.com> Thu, 29 September 2011 00:26 UTC

Return-Path: <dean.willis@softarmor.com>
X-Original-To: rai@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rai@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 227DC11E815D for <rai@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 17:26:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.152
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.152 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.132, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, SARE_MILLIONSOF=0.315, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I6bl5Xetbos2 for <rai@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 17:26:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gy0-f172.google.com (mail-gy0-f172.google.com [209.85.160.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53E1511E8155 for <rai@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 17:26:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gyd12 with SMTP id 12so74458gyd.31 for <rai@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 17:29:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.236.192.197 with SMTP id i45mr22796530yhn.128.1317256155647; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 17:29:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dwillis-mb1.local (cpe-66-25-15-110.tx.res.rr.com. [66.25.15.110]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h20sm1481422ani.16.2011.09.28.17.29.14 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 28 Sep 2011 17:29:14 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4E83BBD9.2070600@softarmor.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 19:29:13 -0500
From: Dean Willis <dean.willis@softarmor.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:7.0) Gecko/20110922 Thunderbird/7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rai@ietf.org
References: <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B222B1F590A@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com> <CAA62EE0.3B275%jason_livingood@cable.comcast.com> <38726EDA2109264987B45E29E758C4D6022C0F@MISOUT7MSGUSR9N.ITServices.sbc.com> <00ab01cc7d31$2cfa1c40$86ee54c0$@us> <4E820778.1070807@softarmor.com> <EDC0A1AE77C57744B664A310A0B23AE220CE44FF@FRMRSSXCHMBSC3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com> <D74629EC-D802-4A33-82AE-DA2A76EA5996@bbn.com> <4E82832E.3090600@nostrum.com> <009501cc7e1d$124b0700$36e11500$@us>
In-Reply-To: <009501cc7e1d$124b0700$36e11500$@us>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [RAI] Global Service Provider ID - draft-pfautz-service-provider-identifier-urn-01
X-BeenThere: rai@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Real-time Applications and Infrastructure \(RAI\)" <rai.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rai>, <mailto:rai-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rai>
List-Post: <mailto:rai@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rai-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rai>, <mailto:rai-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 00:26:27 -0000

On 9/28/11 3:27 PM, Richard Shockey wrote:
> Yea .. 4.3 million "possible" registrations and what is in the registry 1482
> registrations.
>
> Plus ICANN certainly has the money ..too much money if you ask me.

Nothing says they can't charge for a registration. So Adam's right; if 
business booms, they'll find a way to make an industry out of it. Not 
our worry. (But I do want to see the face of somebody at IANA when we 
tell them we're planning for 1,000,000 registrations a year).

However, making sure they don't run out of inventory probably IS our 
problem.


While I agree that 32 bits is PROBABLY enough for the forseeable future, 
if we're going to do something besides ITAD then we might as well go to 
64. But if we're happy with ITAD structurally, there may not be enough 
justification to do more.

At 100 entities per SPID, 32 bits gives us some 430 million entities. 
That's rather short of the 20 billion entities we might see in the very 
near term. Even at 1000 entities per SPID, we're still a factor of 5 
short in the near term.

So what sort of entities-per-SPID ratio are we willing to assume? 
Remember that some entities may have more than one number (I have, at 
last count, 23, including the four companies I currently control).

Is it more of a long-tailed distribution where a few SPIDs have 
tens-of-millions of entities and it tapers off to the right?

--
Dean