IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [RAI] Global Service Provider ID draft-pfautz-service-provider-identifier-urn-01

Dean Willis <dean.willis@softarmor.com> Mon, 03 October 2011 00:19 UTC

Return-Path: <dean.willis@softarmor.com>
X-Original-To: rai@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rai@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77A4421F84FA for <rai@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Oct 2011 17:19:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.312
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.312 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.287, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mySIYuyibsW5 for <rai@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Oct 2011 17:19:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gy0-f172.google.com (mail-gy0-f172.google.com [209.85.160.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA3A921F84F9 for <rai@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Oct 2011 17:19:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gyd12 with SMTP id 12so3691466gyd.31 for <rai@ietf.org>; Sun, 02 Oct 2011 17:22:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.151.69.15 with SMTP id w15mr9266424ybk.250.1317601331455; Sun, 02 Oct 2011 17:22:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dwillis-mb1.local (cpe-66-25-15-110.tx.res.rr.com. [66.25.15.110]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e19sm16466692anm.6.2011.10.02.17.22.09 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 02 Oct 2011 17:22:10 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4E890030.7070809@softarmor.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2011 19:22:08 -0500
From: Dean Willis <dean.willis@softarmor.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:7.0) Gecko/20110922 Thunderbird/7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>
References: <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B222B1F590A@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com> <CAA62EE0.3B275%jason_livingood@cable.comcast.com> <38726EDA2109264987B45E29E758C4D6022C0F@MISOUT7MSGUSR9N.ITServices.sbc.com> <00ab01cc7d31$2cfa1c40$86ee54c0$@us> <4E820778.1070807@softarmor.com> <EDC0A1AE77C57744B664A310A0B23AE220CE44FF@FRMRSSXCHMBSC3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com> <D74629EC-D802-4A33-82AE-DA2A76EA5996@bbn.com> <4E82832E.3090600@nostrum.com> <F3561159-7AE5-46D7-8577-EB765FD84C51@acmepacket.com> <4E84E2E8.6000102@softarmor.com> <031101cc7f0f$ec3fe870$c4bfb950$@us>
In-Reply-To: <031101cc7f0f$ec3fe870$c4bfb950$@us>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: rai@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [RAI] Global Service Provider ID draft-pfautz-service-provider-identifier-urn-01
X-BeenThere: rai@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Real-time Applications and Infrastructure \(RAI\)" <rai.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rai>, <mailto:rai-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rai>
List-Post: <mailto:rai@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rai-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rai>, <mailto:rai-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 00:19:11 -0000

On 9/29/11 8:26 PM, Richard Shockey wrote:
>
> NO..
>
> So can we just go with the ITAD already and get it done?

Ok, so if we define a new 32-bit namespace, and reserve an entry in it 
for each current ITAD holder (using the same ten decimal digits) then 
everybody's happy?

Seems harmless enough. We can call the new namespace ITOLD, short for "I 
told you so..."

--
Dean

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email