IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [saag] Or grow a real PKI (Re: SHA-1 to SHA-n transition)

Jeffrey Hutzelman <jhutz@cmu.edu> Tue, 03 March 2009 17:26 UTC

Return-Path: <jhutz@cmu.edu>
X-Original-To: saag@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: saag@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6458E3A6C04 for <saag@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Mar 2009 09:26:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.200, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZtAhxfTKjgrE for <saag@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Mar 2009 09:26:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from jackfruit.srv.cs.cmu.edu (JACKFRUIT.SRV.CS.CMU.EDU [128.2.201.16]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80E773A6C09 for <saag@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Mar 2009 09:26:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 68-247-236-105.pools.spcsdns.net (173-115-63-122.pools.spcsdns.net [173.115.63.122]) (authenticated bits=0) by jackfruit.srv.cs.cmu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id n23HQkfA011069 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 3 Mar 2009 12:26:48 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 12:26:46 -0500
From: Jeffrey Hutzelman <jhutz@cmu.edu>
To: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>, Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams@sun.com>
Message-ID: <183A1EC1708C7DD712F81C64@atlantis.pc.cs.cmu.edu>
In-Reply-To: <200903031705.n23H5uJa024119@toasties.srv.cs.cmu.edu>
References: <20090227022359.8D45150822@romeo.rtfm.com> <20090302161134.GG9992@Sun.COM> <20090302172135.DA43650822@romeo.rtfm.com> <200903021720.n22HKZOv006388@grapenut.srv.cs.cmu.edu> <864C82388E530D27DCB6002F@minbar.fac.cs.cmu.edu> <20090302182547.GX9992@Sun.COM> <0DE6E86D395C657BABF43B97@minbar.fac.cs.cmu.edu> <20090302185050.GB9992@Sun.COM> <20090302205656.GF9992@Sun.COM> <2788466ED3E31C418E9ACC5C3166155768B2EC@mou1wnexmb09.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <20090303163002.GA9992@Sun.COM> <200903031705.n23H5uJa024119@toasties.srv.cs.cmu.edu>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Linux/x86)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Scanned-By: mimedefang-cmuscs on 128.2.201.16
Cc: saag@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [saag] Or grow a real PKI (Re: SHA-1 to SHA-n transition)
X-BeenThere: saag@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Advisory Group <saag.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/saag>
List-Post: <mailto:saag@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 17:26:24 -0000

--On Tuesday, March 03, 2009 09:04:39 AM -0800 "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" 
<pbaker@verisign.com> wrote:

> Governments can regulate PKIs to be employed for government purposes.

I think you misunderstand the nature of a government's power.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email