IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [saag] SHA-1 to SHA-n transition

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Wed, 25 February 2009 22:43 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: saag@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: saag@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7DA53A68CB for <saag@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:43:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.150, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9e8Vv2c9vThR for <saag@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:43:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (properopus-pt.tunnel.tserv3.fmt2.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f04:392::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E8C23A6A9C for <saag@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:43:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.20.30.158] (sn81.proper.com [75.101.18.81]) (authenticated bits=0) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n1PMhYSW003908 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <saag@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:43:35 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p0624080bc5cb79f0f8b4@[10.20.30.158]>
In-Reply-To: <2788466ED3E31C418E9ACC5C3166155768B2CB@mou1wnexmb09.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
References: <p06240802c5c5c22d92f0@[128.89.89.88]><200902231914.n1NJEDA3011916@raisinb ran.srv.cs.cmu.edu><5A6509457B6F0F71878AA5D2@atlantis.pc.cs.cmu.edu><27884 66ED3E31C418E9ACC5C3166155768B2C7@mou1wnexmb09.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <200902251951.OAA23103@Sparkle.Rodents-Montreal.ORG> <2788466ED3E31C418E9ACC5C3166155768B2CB@mou1wnexmb09.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:43:33 -0800
To: saag@ietf.org
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Subject: Re: [saag] SHA-1 to SHA-n transition
X-BeenThere: saag@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Advisory Group <saag.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/saag>
List-Post: <mailto:saag@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:43:18 -0000

At 2:02 PM -0800 2/25/09, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
>Let us stick to the technical issues here:
> 
>* Is the current transition plan viable or does it fail in the way that I predict
>* Is the proposed solution viable?
>* Is there a better solution?

None of those are technical issues.

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email