IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax

worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley) Mon, 18 February 2013 23:05 UTC

Return-Path: <worley@shell01.TheWorld.com>
X-Original-To: salud@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: salud@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 307AC21F8CE3 for <salud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:05:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.656
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.656 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.324, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.619]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U7hQpGzVxa3g for <salud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:05:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from TheWorld.com (pcls5.std.com [192.74.137.145]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6B2921F8CE0 for <salud@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:05:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shell.TheWorld.com (root@shell01.theworld.com [192.74.137.71]) by TheWorld.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r1IN5F0e022374; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:05:17 -0500
Received: from shell01.TheWorld.com (localhost.theworld.com [127.0.0.1]) by shell.TheWorld.com (8.13.6/8.12.8) with ESMTP id r1IN5Fdt2089099; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:05:15 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from worley@localhost) by shell01.TheWorld.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id r1IN5EBd2088017; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:05:14 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:05:14 -0500
Message-Id: <201302182305.r1IN5EBd2088017@shell01.TheWorld.com>
From: worley@ariadne.com
Sender: worley@ariadne.com
To: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
In-reply-to: <51229F75.809@alum.mit.edu> (pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu)
References: <CACWXZj2WhAsmQ3Ku7bVpiNhbFxX7-vx9d9wWzzKgiVLSeKk__g@mail.gmail.com> <201302132105.r1DL5BM01801234@shell01.TheWorld.com> <CACWXZj0Qq=Q=7necdgCPLeFAMbr3gg-WmBb-8UzegseEd_b_Qw@mail.gmail.com> <51225C60.9050201@alum.mit.edu> <201302182105.r1IL5S7O2079509@shell01.TheWorld.com> <51229F75.809@alum.mit.edu>
Cc: salud@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax
X-BeenThere: salud@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Sip ALerting for User Devices working group discussion list <salud.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/salud>, <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/salud>
List-Post: <mailto:salud@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/salud>, <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 23:05:45 -0000

> From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
> 
> The issue isn't who is the "owner" of the label, but rather what rights 
> are restricted to owners.
> 
> It is possible that the "owner" of a label neither inserts the URN into 
> an Alert-Info nor defines the actual alert data structures in an 
> endpoint that are selected by the Alert-Info URN. It may just strike 
> some agreements with others about these things.

Well, yes, that's why I phrase it, "The entity owning <provider>
... defines the meaning of ...".  The right that is restricted to
owners is to declare what that part of the URN means.

Dale

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email