IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax

Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> Mon, 18 February 2013 23:12 UTC

Return-Path: <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: salud@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: salud@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BEF121E805F for <salud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:12:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.35
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.35 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.087, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_NET=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o6WTKfydlNFV for <salud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:12:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from qmta15.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta15.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe14:44:76:96:59:228]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BEF121E8050 for <salud@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:12:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from omta12.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.44]) by qmta15.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 1xg01l0060xGWP85FzCpsT; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 23:12:49 +0000
Received: from Paul-Kyzivats-MacBook-Pro.local ([50.138.229.164]) by omta12.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 1zCp1l00d3ZTu2S3YzCp5i; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 23:12:49 +0000
Message-ID: <5122B571.4090300@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:12:49 -0500
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Dale R. Worley" <worley@ariadne.com>
References: <CACWXZj2WhAsmQ3Ku7bVpiNhbFxX7-vx9d9wWzzKgiVLSeKk__g@mail.gmail.com> <201302132105.r1DL5BM01801234@shell01.TheWorld.com> <CACWXZj0Qq=Q=7necdgCPLeFAMbr3gg-WmBb-8UzegseEd_b_Qw@mail.gmail.com> <51225C60.9050201@alum.mit.edu> <201302182105.r1IL5S7O2079509@shell01.TheWorld.com> <51229F75.809@alum.mit.edu> <201302182305.r1IN5EBd2088017@shell01.TheWorld.com>
In-Reply-To: <201302182305.r1IN5EBd2088017@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1361229169; bh=quTiAtnZahgV0c0A6ojXVeLPltdgOTmGng5iv/cBnAU=; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject: Content-Type; b=VrSqI9Pxqxn829qEqh/COCswFcqpDlEtovzyGcXVYWCydUPnKY3nvONvgqin6Hgnj YvKj2tJEGqDo3FMmBZymf6SFomVmfOUmojnk5Q+J/oVdkSTIllsBwcLcEs0uwh8T5m cF4/PI2Rv0sjyspP/Fr2+h9ObdVvhOgsbSmEX8fyT4veIXSZSBOST3Vk/Zb5R6fstm FsP62xuQSqRjlqUGkgATnxR6KbOgVoqPdxdOZ1R3XhHvV9xFIgAgtRhrF263Xmo4km xKwNMk9ekIFLOzKX5+iinU4zYT/YLLvwCnZVRueM+4UKHdWm38ozqiweP4LtIctXZW 2JqemSvtKJHaw==
Cc: salud@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax
X-BeenThere: salud@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Sip ALerting for User Devices working group discussion list <salud.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/salud>, <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/salud>
List-Post: <mailto:salud@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/salud>, <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 23:12:51 -0000

On 2/18/13 6:05 PM, Dale R. Worley wrote:
>> From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
>>
>> The issue isn't who is the "owner" of the label, but rather what rights
>> are restricted to owners.
>>
>> It is possible that the "owner" of a label neither inserts the URN into
>> an Alert-Info nor defines the actual alert data structures in an
>> endpoint that are selected by the Alert-Info URN. It may just strike
>> some agreements with others about these things.
>
> Well, yes, that's why I phrase it, "The entity owning <provider>
> ... defines the meaning of ...".  The right that is restricted to
> owners is to declare what that part of the URN means.

OK. WFM.

	Thanks,
	Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email