IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax

worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley) Mon, 18 February 2013 21:06 UTC

Return-Path: <worley@shell01.TheWorld.com>
X-Original-To: salud@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: salud@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04CC421F8CC2 for <salud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 13:06:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.648
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.648 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.332, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.619]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 96grymrOHZEx for <salud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 13:06:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from TheWorld.com (pcls6.std.com [192.74.137.146]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78E7021F8CC5 for <salud@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 13:06:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shell.TheWorld.com (root@shell01.theworld.com [192.74.137.71]) by TheWorld.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r1IL5Ab1024239; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:05:13 -0500
Received: from shell01.TheWorld.com (localhost.theworld.com [127.0.0.1]) by shell.TheWorld.com (8.13.6/8.12.8) with ESMTP id r1IL5ASs2080854; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:05:10 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from worley@localhost) by shell01.TheWorld.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id r1IL59Ce2082192; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:05:09 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:05:09 -0500
Message-Id: <201302182105.r1IL59Ce2082192@shell01.TheWorld.com>
From: worley@ariadne.com
Sender: worley@ariadne.com
To: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
In-reply-to: <EDC0A1AE77C57744B664A310A0B23AE2107016088A@FRMRSSXCHMBSC3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com> (keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com)
References: <CACWXZj2WhAsmQ3Ku7bVpiNhbFxX7-vx9d9wWzzKgiVLSeKk__g@mail.gmail.com> <201302132105.r1DL5BM01801234@shell01.TheWorld.com> <CACWXZj0Qq=Q=7necdgCPLeFAMbr3gg-WmBb-8UzegseEd_b_Qw@mail.gmail.com> <201302181854.r1IIsNFG2067515@shell01.TheWorld.com> <EDC0A1AE77C57744B664A310A0B23AE2107016088A@FRMRSSXCHMBSC3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com>
Cc: salud@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax
X-BeenThere: salud@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Sip ALerting for User Devices working group discussion list <salud.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/salud>, <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/salud>
List-Post: <mailto:salud@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/salud>, <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:06:30 -0000

> From: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
> 
> Aside from the rest of this discussion, I believe we need the ISO
> 8601 reference to at least express:
> 
> 1)	Gregorian calendar
> 2)	"31" represents the 31st rather than 13th

RFC 3339 references ISO 8601, so I don't think we *need* to reference
ISO 8601 as long as we reference RFC 3339.

Dale

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email