Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax

[Paul Kyzivat <[e-mail]>]

On 3/16/13 3:19 AM, Dale R. Worley wrote:

> What uses outside SIP are we contemplating?  My understanding is that
> the URNs are defined to indicate facts about SIP dialogs, or about how
> a user is to be told about a dialog.

They seem applicable to alerting regardless of signaling protocol.
But of course there are only a few such protocols.

I only looked briefly at the rules for registering ietf params, but that 
left me questioning if our syntax would be permitted, even ignoring 
private names. Those private names certainly wouldn't fit.

I don't think we should spend too much more time worrying about this. If 
they are going to reject on that basis I doubt there is much we can do 
to spin this to avoid it. Rather, I think we might have to raise an appeal.

	Thanks,
	Paul