Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax

[Laura Liess <[e-mail]>]

2013/3/16 Paul Kyzivat <[e-mail]>

> On 3/16/13 3:19 AM, Dale R. Worley wrote:
>
>  What uses outside SIP are we contemplating?  My understanding is that
>> the URNs are defined to indicate facts about SIP dialogs, or about how
>> a user is to be told about a dialog.
>>
>
> They seem applicable to alerting regardless of signaling protocol.
> But of course there are only a few such protocols.
>
> I only looked briefly at the rules for registering ietf params, but that
> left me questioning if our syntax would be permitted, even ignoring private
> names. Those private names certainly wouldn't fit.
>
> I don't think we should spend too much more time worrying about this. If
> they are going to reject on that basis I doubt there is much we can do to
> spin this to avoid it. Rather, I think we might have to raise an appeal.
>

This is OK for me.

Thank you
Laura

>
>         Thanks,
>         Paul
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> salud mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/**listinfo/salud<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/salud>
>