Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax
Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> Fri, 08 March 2013 17:23 UTC
Return-Path: <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: salud@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: salud@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A1B521F8628 for <salud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Mar 2013 09:23:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.27
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.27 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.167, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_NET=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BmDM+9mt9wKp for <salud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Mar 2013 09:23:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from qmta02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe14:43:76:96:62:24]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED11E21F8615 for <salud@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Mar 2013 09:23:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from omta11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.36]) by qmta02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 8zf71l0050mv7h0515P75Y; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 17:23:07 +0000
Received: from Paul-Kyzivats-MacBook-Pro.local ([50.138.229.164]) by omta11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 95P61l00z3ZTu2S3X5P7UM; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 17:23:07 +0000
Message-ID: <513A1E7A.3000600@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2013 01:23:06 +0800
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130216 Thunderbird/17.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: salud@ietf.org
References: <CACWXZj2WhAsmQ3Ku7bVpiNhbFxX7-vx9d9wWzzKgiVLSeKk__g@mail.gmail.com> <201302132105.r1DL5BM01801234@shell01.TheWorld.com> <CACWXZj0Qq=Q=7necdgCPLeFAMbr3gg-WmBb-8UzegseEd_b_Qw@mail.gmail.com> <201302181854.r1IIsNFG2067515@shell01.TheWorld.com> <CACWXZj2P58HXJUAYQyB_mp9z_-qCCVwKD1jHhcJg6kGxJ5xVng@mail.gmail.com> <201302212027.r1LKRU4D2297154@shell01.TheWorld.com> <CACWXZj1txwpeCFqAJrJQpL845BNswyvm651WABGULr0DuEwF3A@mail.gmail.com> <201302221824.r1MIOpqh2386335@shell01.TheWorld.com> <CACWXZj0nsvE0ey2H=a0azN+eWSPq2oJnbC6VxyRKA0bEhkPQjg@mail.gmail.com> <51390F9F.2070708@alum.mit.edu> <201303081630.r28GUSKl028790@shell01.TheWorld.com> <CACWXZj2cadevRdh8uFXraqhrNtMguiid+RZVRNt0T30yeyzykg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACWXZj2cadevRdh8uFXraqhrNtMguiid+RZVRNt0T30yeyzykg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1362763387; bh=1DOKDzifgiF5GRAsrMwVCF3oL6GvDvgnMXBfS45AO6I=; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject: Content-Type; b=Dqaf/lO9ZHqvfoZ2ByJuLENX3adKhoyxksltkZjnBrOE+6NF7RIq4h1ea499/bbM6 ScnAkmoAPYVhpsgV7xAcplqxx70xiVoP6g2YAbuHaC/VBuchslNsRp/66ghXkKdGCx COZZ1YUgXEDzU0Y5Av+qPLsg5s02TTd6zec6zymuwDRQglnJRn2qtVG9cwnTnS9rCo vP4fn6Hvi5GnY+REgdhbPiFa9QWJSA57F0K6YUrq61yoInWTVKLsybgKIu0tvG/liA Zss3Pn3srdTtuHxRoMRXHSQqm7YuT2tfRaxSY1IdkVF6YcFG+gCG+MsFzkms86D2CB pUrUzgpVFdzqA==
Subject: Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax
X-BeenThere: salud@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Sip ALerting for User Devices working group discussion list <salud.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/salud>, <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/salud>
List-Post: <mailto:salud@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/salud>, <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2013 17:23:09 -0000
I'm ok with leaving as-is. Paul On 3/9/13 12:57 AM, Laura Liess wrote: > Dale, > > > 2013/3/8 Dale R. Worley <worley@ariadne.com <mailto:worley@ariadne.com>> > > > > alert-URN = "urn:alert:" alert-identifier > > > alert-identifier = alert-category ":" alert-indication > > > alert-category = alert-name > > > alert-indication = alert-name *(":" alert-name) > > > alert-name = alert-label / private-name > > > private-name = alert-label "@" provider > > > provider = provider-id ["(" date ")"] > > > provider-id = 1*(domain-label ".") domain-label > > > alert-label = let-dig [ *let-dig-hyp let-dig ] > > > domain-label = let-dig [ *let-dig-hyp let-dig ] > > > Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2013 06:07:27 +0800 > > From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu > <mailto:pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>> > > > > This looks good. For reasons of non-redundancy, I would be > inclined to > > make one tweak: > > > > alert-label = domain-label > > We might consider: > > alert-label = label > domain-label = label > label = let-dig [ *let-dig-hyp let-dig ] > > But the savings are small. > > > I would leave them as they are, for the reasons I gave in my previous > mail to Paul. > > Additionally, I found out that we use the word "label" in the section > 6.1 in a way which would not be consistent with the syntax above. > > "Alert URN identifiers are identified by <label>s managed by IANA, > according to the processes outlined in [RFC5226] in a new registry > called "Alert URN Labels". Thus, creating a new Alert-Info URN > identifier requires IANA action. The policy for adding a new alert > category is 'Standards Action'. (This document defines the alert > categories 'service', 'source', 'priority', 'duration', 'delay' and > 'locale'. ) The policy for assigning <label>s to <alert-indication>s > and the rules to combine them may differ for each <alert-category> > and MUST be defined by the document describing the corresponding > alert category. " > > > Thank you > Laura > > > > > > > > > Dale > _______________________________________________ > salud mailing list > salud@ietf.org <mailto:salud@ietf.org> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/salud > > > > > _______________________________________________ > salud mailing list > salud@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/salud >
- [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Laura Liess
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Dale R. Worley
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Dale R. Worley
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Laura Liess
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Dale R. Worley
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Dale R. Worley
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Dale R. Worley
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Dale R. Worley
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Dale R. Worley
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Laura Liess
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Dale R. Worley
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Laura Liess
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Dale R. Worley
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Laura Liess
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Laura Liess
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Dale R. Worley
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Dale R. Worley
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Laura Liess
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Laura Liess
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Dale R. Worley
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Laura Liess
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Dale R. Worley
- [salud] Fwd: New version of the ABNF-syntax Laura Liess
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Dale R. Worley
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Laura Liess
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Dale R. Worley
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Laura Liess
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Laura Liess
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Dale R. Worley
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Laura Liess
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Dale R. Worley
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Laura Liess