IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spfbis] Review of draft-ietf-spfbis-experiment-05

Scott Kitterman <spf2@kitterman.com> Mon, 23 April 2012 10:50 UTC

Return-Path: <spf2@kitterman.com>
X-Original-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FF7321F86CB for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 03:50:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.581
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.581 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.017, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jXqI3ONuqjKr for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 03:50:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout03.controlledmail.com (mailout03.controlledmail.com [208.43.65.50]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A6FC21F86B2 for <spfbis@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 03:50:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout03.controlledmail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailout03.controlledmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6987DD0408C; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 05:49:59 -0500 (CDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=kitterman.com; s=2007-00; t=1335178199; bh=mu7Eb0UvV0UI2SVBiNq6F2KZREVQUE9ZuH8tsKphElA=; h=References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Subject:From: Date:To:Message-ID; b=cWwCI9W6fL/wqSXeVz4HYc8hPKflp5fkwe0lXNVY4hnue9yE2n/+GXYEnOs+tGLID N/zjudfIM+Tr4o+iQe474FGSdeJ1gN2yjcPym8egfMoU1xpeQdNuEvaZW9K2WO9z26 y4DG2hyK64W5EOXUP34ooJOnhsZLnA2bIfBTNjfs=
Received: from [192.168.111.101] (static-72-81-252-21.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net [72.81.252.21]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailout03.controlledmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 248CED0404B; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 05:49:58 -0500 (CDT)
References: <CAC4RtVAV5PH+VMzppVxAQgGq0f28ARN846e17G_8sbLCThm-KA@mail.gmail.com> <20120423100752.GQ99904@verdi>
User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android
In-Reply-To: <20120423100752.GQ99904@verdi>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----9WVYC35508UZZ94784C0ZL2O4A3GG8"
From: Scott Kitterman <spf2@kitterman.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 06:50:06 -0400
To: "spfbis@ietf.org" <spfbis@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <84f787db-1601-47e5-a8e4-2d3301e12b11@email.android.com>
X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
Subject: Re: [spfbis] Review of draft-ietf-spfbis-experiment-05
X-BeenThere: spfbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SPFbis discussion list <spfbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spfbis>
List-Post: <mailto:spfbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 10:50:01 -0000

Snip.

That's all true, but not, I think relevant to the question of record reuse. There was consensus in MARID that reuse of SPF records for Sender ID PRA assessments was technically inappropriate.

I don't think it's correct to apply words about the MARID shutdown to changes that were made later.

Scott K

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email