IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spfbis] Review of draft-ietf-spfbis-experiment-05

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> Tue, 24 April 2012 19:43 UTC

Return-Path: <msk@cloudmark.com>
X-Original-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8D0321F880F for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 12:43:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.55
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.55 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.049, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id urNBckJ-U55M for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 12:43:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.cloudmark.com (cmgw1.cloudmark.com [208.83.136.25]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E8FB21F87FA for <spfbis@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 12:43:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com ([72.5.239.25]) by mail.cloudmark.com with bizsmtp id 1std1j0030ZaKgw01stdPh; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 09:53:37 -0700
X-CMAE-Match: 0
X-CMAE-Score: 0.00
X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=fNu7LOme c=1 sm=1 a=LdFkGDrDWH2mcjCZERnC4w==:17 a=LvckAehuu68A:10 a=w0_tcEhzsP4A:10 a=zutiEJmiVI4A:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=Fwq7WybbK03v2WDsciMA:9 a=8lNyc3fhs-n7A55m7ZcA:7 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=lZB815dzVvQA:10 a=LdFkGDrDWH2mcjCZERnC4w==:117
Received: from EXCH-MBX901.corp.cloudmark.com ([fe80::addf:849a:f71c:4a82]) by exch-htcas901.corp.cloudmark.com ([fe80::2524:76b6:a865:539c%10]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.002; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 09:53:16 -0700
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
To: "spfbis@ietf.org" <spfbis@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [spfbis] Review of draft-ietf-spfbis-experiment-05
Thread-Index: AQHNIMqwFmLLWp0VJEuOTXJcBTjdz5anzRGA//+OihCAAHiZAP//5QzwgAB83oD//46t8AAPXI6AABXK2AAAAN7GgAAAR9OAAAAJrwAAAoysAAAEE4eAACC0csA=
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:53:15 +0000
Message-ID: <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E003928100C5F@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com>
References: <CAC4RtVAV5PH+VMzppVxAQgGq0f28ARN846e17G_8sbLCThm-KA@mail.gmail.com> <3365685.ptXhF5PY8S@scott-latitude-e6320> <20120423145947.GH55520@mail.yitter.info> <63583111.FeGGmhBaS4@scott-latitude-e6320> <CAC4RtVCnFXT=goe0tgJjq1CsOV_TRK+XSR5GDu8DjGtVN7b8KA@mail.gmail.com> <4F959B1F.6020007@Commerco.Net>
In-Reply-To: <4F959B1F.6020007@Commerco.Net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.20.2.121]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cloudmark.com; s=default; t=1335286417; bh=nEJJdNwHJ7JPWIedaIlCOXnCGexPHDh4JXluqF/1AmU=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=gGwr/wecAQzeKVoiRNS2I0RO8hFz5xvDuGCI1ws2emlxW0Gble4QuqEGiDAut7SM/ 9WRwWjGm69O8gMUj8UpF13Q5+zF2nKUCjw5mQsIMEBnZD7cm6GPiOnIwDcrt4Sy4Z3 3al7fczzOHI0HVO838asG4kbHMx+QE00VI8GY0hg=
Subject: Re: [spfbis] Review of draft-ietf-spfbis-experiment-05
X-BeenThere: spfbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SPFbis discussion list <spfbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spfbis>
List-Post: <mailto:spfbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 19:43:59 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: spfbis-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:spfbis-bounces@ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of Commerco WebMaster
> Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 11:11 AM
> To: spfbis@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [spfbis] Review of draft-ietf-spfbis-experiment-05
> 
> New looks cleaner.  Would it be possible (and does it make sense) to
> add something like -
> 
> "Measurement data gathered for both the Sender-ID and SPF experiments
> indicate SPF adoption levels in the community as the preferred
> protocol, thus offering the reasonable path forward."

Works for me.  Others?

-MSK

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status