IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spfbis] Review of draft-ietf-spfbis-experiment-05

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Mon, 23 April 2012 14:59 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6570921F86B5 for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 07:59:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.67
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.67 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.071, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jCpbp0nkgcKN for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 07:59:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.yitter.info (mail.yitter.info [208.86.224.201]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8DF121F86C1 for <spfbis@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 07:59:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.yitter.info (69-196-144-227.dsl.teksavvy.com [69.196.144.227]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 51E221ECB41C for <spfbis@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:59:53 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 10:59:51 -0400
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: spfbis@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20120423145947.GH55520@mail.yitter.info>
References: <CAC4RtVAV5PH+VMzppVxAQgGq0f28ARN846e17G_8sbLCThm-KA@mail.gmail.com> <2738361.74YB1Lktta@scott-latitude-e6320> <20120423142646.GE55520@mail.yitter.info> <3365685.ptXhF5PY8S@scott-latitude-e6320>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3365685.ptXhF5PY8S@scott-latitude-e6320>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Subject: Re: [spfbis] Review of draft-ietf-spfbis-experiment-05
X-BeenThere: spfbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SPFbis discussion list <spfbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spfbis>
List-Post: <mailto:spfbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:59:56 -0000

No hat.

On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 10:51:49AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> I think it's highly relevant to how the data on usage is interpreted.

How?  I don't see it.  If you're arguing for inclusion, the burden of
proof is on you.

Best,

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email