Re: [Uri-review] Request for review
Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com> Wed, 11 November 2020 16:06 UTC
Return-Path: <tim@dropnumber.com>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29A963A0C8E for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 08:06:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.875
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.875 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HT7BNAniGtNB for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 08:06:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C53C33A101E for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 08:06:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from oxuslxaltgw03.schlund.de ([10.72.76.59]) by mrelay.perfora.net (mreueus004 [74.208.5.2]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1M8gu5-1khZSy3zPd-004i9C for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 17:06:02 +0100
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 11:06:01 -0500
From: Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com>
Cc: uri-review@ietf.org
Message-ID: <1545345914.10373.1605110761654@email.ionos.com>
In-Reply-To: <624184630.116213.1590182968873@email.ionos.com>
References: <491516506.246380.1589851279474@email.ionos.com>, <ead89691-e0a4-e1dc-4d79-fbe65722731b@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, <122709156.27676.1590010716156@email.ionos.com> <5EC5F6A9.7599.23B3E5E7@dan.tobias.name> <624184630.116213.1590182968873@email.ionos.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.3-Rev26
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:Fa7BNr7l/CmRtHD/isjz4JZA4k+dBVk6AAYGCjuYFRpYtuD9bD5 yhRbVmeizauHHAcWW19jhqPMqX7NynLVHPJFkHXzDP2T01c8gH+J9oou/u3Ja4+C27Oi7ZH j3W7PMjYzRN54uUC0OPYpDGoiRi/DQtBweyXZC4TFoUbWSl3Dj4pKhQ6xPR8VMrqOdJEhf+ hdn9g62vuIAIzUDDiDksg==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:Ut7fviLqNhs=:BmvHHVZXVXrMJukzJYLCB7 gtTYAhE3OI5Yaw53ryWEp+pVDC1l71SGxVXewPaBccj9eAnlmOnDMV8YNyrIvdo55rwnocDFa GzCr10XUpzXyEWpQYRwrYVOM9rDnX5y+jOKmKZH2S85CbD1tIvBmEMdOsrD3J0N02E/adY8iY UzmidLuAPgeMXsQwL3ius3byQkuLYnfDyIQFLkaYMXyGhsovPPMoXV9+KhVnr0qUO4sqsyM1c 1XvGGVEYomP6fZoIZ54fHctC+EK+g+dXj9SDdgkS0vtoMtuv31r9a7TFoFWhb2kQgKm34L9dQ Ph3WCkA8HCFMSZA7tifWpN13K+lKxmnTSWl4qAz9kt2/Q3WYR49JzE9zoxckI2XKOFRhKBlA4 mJ9UGf+hb7oAy7dzhz3PzV+kXrH2j0/pfAAWGW9qgPAVm+nIfkQsrDL+DUyzFxG1EjqPFHs0q v/yTwahTBw==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uri-review/uB8Iljs4qcXCNubbWm_JwKymAjA>
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] Request for review
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uri-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 16:06:18 -0000
text version: Hello everyone, The second draft of the 'drop' URI scheme is available and can be found here < https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mcsweeney-drop-scheme/>. Thank you. Sincerely, Tim McSweeney > On 05/22/2020 5:29 PM Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com> wrote: > > > Hello everyone, > > The second draft of the 'drop' URI scheme is available and can be found here < https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mcsweeney-drop-scheme/>. Thank you. > > > Sincerely, > Tim McSweeney > > On May 20, 2020 at 11:34 PM "Daniel R. Tobias" < dan@tobias.name> wrote: > > > > > > On 20 May 2020 at 17:38, Timothy Mcsweeney wrote: > > > > > I followed your instructions and I could not recreate what you wanted > > > me to see. Here are the two pages I made: > > > < http://www.soupsdeli.com/base.html> > > > < http://www.soupsdeli.com/drop> > > > Perhaps it had something to do with the hosting provider?? I'm not > > > sure what's wrong here. > > This is the content of your first page: > > > > <!doctype html> > > <html> > > <head><meta charset="us-ascii"> > > <title>test link</title> > > > > </head> > > <body> > > <div> <h2><a href=' http://drop#fg34htx' target="_blank" > > rel="noopener">Link to drop URI</a></div> > > </body> > > </html> > > > > > > As you can see, the "href" value doesn't have "drop#fg34htx" by > > itself as requested; it has a " http://" (http://) before it. This transforms it > > into a http URI with "drop" as its domain, which my browser > > "helpfully" converts into a link to drop.com. It would presumably > > then go to the fragment #fg34htx in that page if such a fragment > > existed. > > > > -- > > == Dan == > > Dan's Mail Format Site: http://mailformat.dan.info/ > > Dan's Web Tips: http://webtips.dan.info/ > > Dan's Domain Site: http://domains.dan.info/ > >
- [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Henry S. Thompson
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Ted Hardie
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Daniel R. Tobias
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Daniel R. Tobias
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Daniel R. Tobias
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Daniel R. Tobias
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Erik Wilde
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Dave Thaler
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Dave Thaler
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Dave Thaler
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Graham Klyne
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Ted Hardie
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Graham Klyne
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Michael Wojcik
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Michael Wojcik
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Daniel R. Tobias
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Larry Masinter
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Thomas Fruin
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Henry S. Thompson
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Daniel R. Tobias
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney