IETF Logo Mail Archive

[v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-incremental-ipv6 WGLC

Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Sun, 04 August 2013 18:00 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90DB821F9D6B for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Aug 2013 11:00:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rWQGQP+W6g30 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Aug 2013 11:00:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mtv-iport-3.cisco.com (mtv-iport-3.cisco.com [173.36.130.14]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C15AC21F85E8 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Aug 2013 11:00:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=639; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1375639209; x=1376848809; h=date:from:message-id:to:subject:cc; bh=Lu85nh6fJjKXuGoQAQMcQ4+u8MbjVrtOnfy++nuKelo=; b=G40/oHwMUlJAS48ja1C0sBVHaxhBzN63CLfQWu5fM7yxyuC8sXjSOOxJ m/A2kO8fkDLG6rxS1853ME4Eq/9RQg1rU4dq3/6knGvTyuo3SYzNOVtCQ k1CnBVxQE1O53mtFUiz2BD1ZXvRKCn/q6Tbij/KESrPAejRHuJtmiwDI1 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApMGAPyV/lGrRDoG/2dsb2JhbABagwY1rWsBkXmBGRZ0gyQ8NIhwDbUvkBkdgwN0A4kqj2CQJYM3
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.89,813,1367971200"; d="scan'208";a="85815844"
Received: from mtv-core-1.cisco.com ([171.68.58.6]) by mtv-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 04 Aug 2013 18:00:08 +0000
Received: from irp-view13.cisco.com (irp-view13.cisco.com [171.70.120.60]) by mtv-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r74I07Yw000755 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 4 Aug 2013 18:00:07 GMT
Received: from irp-view13.cisco.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by irp-view13.cisco.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r74I03RC023055; Sun, 4 Aug 2013 11:00:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from fred@localhost) by irp-view13.cisco.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4/Submit) id r74I03pC023049; Sun, 4 Aug 2013 11:00:03 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2013 11:00:03 -0700
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
Message-Id: <201308041800.r74I03pC023049@irp-view13.cisco.com>
To: v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-incremental-ipv6 WGLC
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2013 18:00:14 -0000

This is to initiate a two week working group last call of
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-incremental-ipv6.  Please read it now. If you find nits
(spelling errors, minor suggested wording changes, etc), comment to the
authors; if you find greater issues, such as disagreeing with a
statement or finding additional issues that need to be addressed,
please post your comments to the list.

We are looking specifically for comments on the importance of the
document as well as its content. If you have read the document and
believe it to be of operational utility, that is also an important
comment to make.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email