IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] 464XLAT Trial Deployment Report - 6rd in mobiles?

Rémi Després <despres.remi@laposte.net> Thu, 09 February 2012 08:28 UTC

Return-Path: <despres.remi@laposte.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD8D321F85C3 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Feb 2012 00:28:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.807, BAYES_20=-0.74, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lSzbZIYytDnc for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Feb 2012 00:28:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp21.services.sfr.fr (smtp21.services.sfr.fr [93.17.128.4]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5276E21F85C2 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Feb 2012 00:28:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from filter.sfr.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by msfrf2116.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id ACE9C70000FF; Thu, 9 Feb 2012 09:28:31 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.0.21] (per92-10-88-166-221-144.fbx.proxad.net [88.166.221.144]) by msfrf2116.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 5F72770000EA; Thu, 9 Feb 2012 09:28:31 +0100 (CET)
X-SFR-UUID: 20120209082831391.5F72770000EA@msfrf2116.sfr.fr
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-2-429076760"
From: Rémi Després <despres.remi@laposte.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAD6AjGQySpBDLoZedp4mnXfcYQ-iDtwHnO4vN+3atdEhTOrcuA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:28:31 +0100
Message-Id: <A5AD6157-6E83-4758-8813-3CC0E7151A26@laposte.net>
References: <CAD6AjGSRUdx32arseR26RzHNtMri8Vrif3dCQmuk7B52GmoHAw@mail.gmail.com> <CAC8QAcfYJVMVoUg0LGQCzagzQB9L86_JCoa2CE-oYi5=APYSJg@mail.gmail.com> <CAD6AjGQySpBDLoZedp4mnXfcYQ-iDtwHnO4vN+3atdEhTOrcuA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Cameron Byrne <cb.list6@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-sfr-mailing: LEGIT
Cc: IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] 464XLAT Trial Deployment Report - 6rd in mobiles?
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:28:32 -0000

Le 2012-02-03 à 22:53, Cameron Byrne a écrit :
> On Feb 3, 2012 12:58 PM, "Behcet Sarikaya" <sarikaya2012@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
...
> > As you know, many UEs can not connect to an UMTS network on IPv6 due
> > to the firmware problem.
> >
> 
> Absolutely
> 
Consequence: 6rd would be very useful to permit rapid IPv6-service availability in mobile networks.
(AFAIK it is technically trivial, but does need the will to do it.)

Something missing?

Regards,
RD

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email