IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [irsg] New document shepherd writeup

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Thu, 02 June 2022 11:59 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF6D0C15AAE2 for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Jun 2022 04:59:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J6PH02gTbsDA for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Jun 2022 04:59:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.15]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4057AC15AAE0 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Jun 2022 04:59:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (p5089ad4f.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.173.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4LDPh26hjPzDCbL; Thu, 2 Jun 2022 13:59:30 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.100.31\))
Subject: Re: [irsg] New document shepherd writeup
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <97876287-2E98-4636-BB31-1F75EA92E805@eggert.org>
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2022 13:59:30 +0200
Cc: IETF WG Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7F4C37E9-E87C-493F-A11F-7911C9588DB7@tzi.org>
References: <F4A44FCE-D31B-4FE8-9950-6C60CDD9DD36@eggert.org> <97876287-2E98-4636-BB31-1F75EA92E805@eggert.org>
To: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.100.31)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/g0PCb4uzmRjbj29puHMG8dk5-4E>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2022 11:59:40 -0000

On 1. Jun 2022, at 11:40, Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> wrote:
> 
> I've started a PR that is trying to incorporate that feedback: https://github.com/ietf-tools/datatracker/pull/4042
> 
> Please take a look and comment? (Ideally, as PR reviews.)

I made a PR comment [1], but to avoid split discussion venues, here is a copy:

This is now very different from the original

>>> (5) Do portions of the document need review from a particular or
>>> from broader perspective, e.g., security, operational complexity,
>>> AAA, DNS, DHCP, XML, or internationalization? If so, describe the
>>> review that took place.

The original is closer to "Have you consulted your YANG doctor", while the new text is not addressing foundational technologies at all but instead asks about related (presumably ongoing) work. 
What kind of relation?
Addressing a related problem, but in a different way, based on different foundational technologies?

Grüße, Carsten

[1]: https://github.com/ietf-tools/datatracker/pull/4042/files#r887869060

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email