Re: New document shepherd writeup
Michael Tuexen <michael.tuexen@macmic.franken.de> Wed, 04 May 2022 13:39 UTC
Return-Path: <michael.tuexen@macmic.franken.de>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF5FDC157B50 for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 May 2022 06:39:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.83
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.83 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.069, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O7DsKsuhy8E9 for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 May 2022 06:39:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from drew.franken.de (drew.ipv6.franken.de [IPv6:2001:638:a02:a001:20e:cff:fe4a:feaa]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AE4DC157B55 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 May 2022 06:39:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [IPv6:2a02:8109:1140:c3d:e96a:1bdb:d2d5:c5e8]) (Authenticated sender: macmic) by mail-n.franken.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 517A0721E2808; Wed, 4 May 2022 15:38:56 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.80.82.1.1\))
Subject: Re: New document shepherd writeup
From: Michael Tuexen <michael.tuexen@macmic.franken.de>
In-Reply-To: <FAC35BA0-0955-4CCF-A278-D9BFF233C603@eggert.org>
Date: Wed, 04 May 2022 15:38:55 +0200
Cc: Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com>, IETF WG Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E66933CF-1272-48D2-A8E7-BE1CE0859D3B@macmic.franken.de>
References: <F4A44FCE-D31B-4FE8-9950-6C60CDD9DD36@eggert.org> <CAOW+2dsiHimBnUr1++Y+nq6r6oxA5jDa8sXM4g3k-vjXfDbPfQ@mail.gmail.com> <3EE82F27-F170-4E89-8491-B021C94E7B28@eggert.org> <69281967-83db-9ec3-26e1-67028a0cfa92@joelhalpern.com> <FAC35BA0-0955-4CCF-A278-D9BFF233C603@eggert.org>
To: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.80.82.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/mQLK49ydtQ42CMELXJi41yWH2nc>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 May 2022 13:39:06 -0000
> On 4. May 2022, at 15:12, Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > On 2022-5-4, at 15:46, Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> wrote: >> As written, this seems to conflate two different concepts. >> >> One of which seems to be a new requirement, although sometimes practiced. >> >> The important existing requirement was that the authors (and by some interpretations the named contributors) confirmed explicitly that all known IPR believed to be relevant has been disclosed. That requires explicit responses from those people. >> >> This text instead seems to ask if the WG has been reminded that they need ot disclose relevant known IPR. While a reasonable ask, it is not the same as the preceding and can not be answered the same way. > > first, the term "interested community" was already used in several places in the previous shepherd writeup template; see https://github.com/ietf-tools/datatracker/blob/5a31658b7f87054237430ee5fab8a23a8b32a7e8/ietf/templates/doc/shepherd_writeup.txt > > You're correct that a change was made to this original question: > > (7) Has each author confirmed that any and all appropriate > IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the provisions > of BCP 78 and BCP 79 have already been filed. If not, explain why? > > The text was broadened to "the interested community", because the shepherd need not only check that the authors have done so, but also that all contributors have done so. We probably should have phrased it as such and not reused the "interested community" term which was already used elsewhere. When is a person a contributor? Whoever is listed in the Ack section? Why are these persons required to answer such a question? Best regards Michael > > Thanks, > Lars >
- New document shepherd writeup Lars Eggert
- Re: New document shepherd writeup Mark Nottingham
- Re: New document shepherd writeup Bernard Aboba
- Re: New document shepherd writeup Mark Nottingham
- Re: New document shepherd writeup Lars Eggert
- Re: New document shepherd writeup Lars Eggert
- Re: New document shepherd writeup David Noveck
- Re: [irsg] New document shepherd writeup Carsten Bormann
- Re: New document shepherd writeup Salz, Rich
- Re: New document shepherd writeup Joel Halpern
- Re: New document shepherd writeup Lars Eggert
- Re: New document shepherd writeup Michael Tuexen
- Re: New document shepherd writeup Barry Leiba
- Re: New document shepherd writeup Brian Rosen
- Re: New document shepherd writeup Michael Tuexen
- Re: New document shepherd writeup Sean Turner
- Re: New document shepherd writeup John Scudder
- Re: New document shepherd writeup Fred Baker
- Re: [irsg] New document shepherd writeup Carsten Bormann
- Re: New document shepherd writeup Bob Hinden
- Re: New document shepherd writeup Thomas Nadeau
- Re: New document shepherd writeup Salz, Rich
- Re: New document shepherd writeup Sean Turner
- Re: New document shepherd writeup John Scudder
- Re: New document shepherd writeup Alvaro Retana
- Re: New document shepherd writeup Salz, Rich
- Re: New document shepherd writeup Paul Wouters
- Re: New document shepherd writeup Salz, Rich
- Re: New document shepherd writeup John Scudder
- Re: New document shepherd writeup Salz, Rich
- Re: [irsg] New document shepherd writeup Carsten Bormann
- Re: [irsg] New document shepherd writeup John Scudder
- Re: [irsg] New document shepherd writeup Carsten Bormann
- Re: New document shepherd writeup Mark Nottingham
- Re: [irsg] New document shepherd writeup Michael Richardson
- Re: [irsg] New document shepherd writeup Carsten Bormann
- Re: [irsg] New document shepherd writeup Fred Baker
- RE: [irsg] New document shepherd writeup Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [irsg] New document shepherd writeup Michael Tuexen
- Re: [irsg] New document shepherd writeup Salz, Rich
- Re: [irsg] New document shepherd writeup Barry Leiba
- Re: [irsg] New document shepherd writeup Michael Richardson
- Re: [irsg] New document shepherd writeup Michael Tuexen
- Re: [irsg] New document shepherd writeup Michael Richardson
- RE: New document shepherd writeup Adrian Farrel
- Re: [irsg] New document shepherd writeup Michael Tuexen
- Re: New document shepherd writeup Sean Turner
- Re: New document shepherd writeup David Noveck
- Re: New document shepherd writeup Lars Eggert
- Re: New document shepherd writeup Salz, Rich
- Re: New document shepherd writeup David Noveck
- Re: [irsg] New document shepherd writeup Carsten Bormann
- Re: New document shepherd writeup Lars Eggert