IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: New document shepherd writeup

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Wed, 04 May 2022 06:02 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C090C15E3F3 for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 May 2022 23:02:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y7uC41LGO_5k for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 May 2022 23:02:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:211:32ff:fe22:186f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87060C157B41 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 May 2022 23:02:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:69a2:4d85:86c:ea75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9F0BA1DA92B; Wed, 4 May 2022 09:02:14 +0300 (EEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eggert.org; s=dkim; t=1651644134; bh=85YwvYpEzxammhZYpy2bg71x4G6GPq03vvdbLK1tBBE=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=IGEJ+JErrhUfuoW6rhZ2zqKL2KWo3BeKSgcnRAv1LBH3fYa6BLqHtuu1EMaK9czby sLUqFBgIasyqfbSx2DrtQtc83ACAqqth9FMQ2r7BJUn7XH/32P4R5bBfS87fuTJ+5c YwUQ4RRWnN2slSUBHvUquBjb1DdDKBOTml8FGBN0=
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_52A96545-24F9-434B-B491-5511252FD4C6"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.80.82.1.1\))
Subject: Re: New document shepherd writeup
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAOW+2dsiHimBnUr1++Y+nq6r6oxA5jDa8sXM4g3k-vjXfDbPfQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 04 May 2022 09:02:14 +0300
Cc: IETF WG Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <3EE82F27-F170-4E89-8491-B021C94E7B28@eggert.org>
References: <F4A44FCE-D31B-4FE8-9950-6C60CDD9DD36@eggert.org> <CAOW+2dsiHimBnUr1++Y+nq6r6oxA5jDa8sXM4g3k-vjXfDbPfQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
X-MailScanner-ID: 9F0BA1DA92B.A4222
X-MailScanner: Not scanned: please contact your Internet E-Mail Service Provider for details
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/mzi97nNESlodvkoxzjkIDLEJKAw>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 May 2022 06:02:25 -0000

Hi,

On 2022-5-4, at 1:39, Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> "Has the interested community confirmed that any and all appropriate IPR disclosures required by BCP 78 and BCP 79 have been filed? "
> 
> [BA] What is the "interested community" with respect to IPR declarations?  This used to be the authors of the document. Has it changed?

it used to be just the authors, but then got broadened out to ask about the entire WG. The wording "interested community" was chosen to also capture the non-WG-document case. Could this be made clearer?

Thanks,
Lars

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email