Re: [6gip] 6G

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Thu, 14 January 2021 11:33 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 6gip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6gip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EACC3A1316 for <6gip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 03:33:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.406
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.406 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD=1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.262, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UIBGWA5kfl4x for <6gip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 03:33:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E9033A1310 for <6gip@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 03:33:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by cirse-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 10EBXApH012926; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 12:33:10 +0100
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id EFBEC206165; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 12:33:09 +0100 (CET)
Received: from muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.13]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC1C0204A18; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 12:33:09 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.14.10.2] ([10.14.10.2]) by muguet2-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 10EBX9Xk030121; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 12:33:09 +0100
To: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Cc: Kaippallimalil John <john.kaippallimalil@futurewei.com>, "Flinck, Hannu (Nokia - FI/Espoo)" <hannu.flinck@nokia-bell-labs.com>, "6gip@ietf.org" <6gip@ietf.org>
References: <HE1PR07MB3386A43B4B32BF2CE5DC48C79BAA0@HE1PR07MB3386.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <248399ab-7dc1-ee13-928c-751568ea58e5@gmail.com> <HE1PR07MB3386A19851BFFF1ED5DDECAE9BA90@HE1PR07MB3386.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <SA0PR13MB40801CE55D18D1EF814ED7CDE8A99@SA0PR13MB4080.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <86fad3c0-a5b0-f6a5-4671-1802d724c5a5@gmail.com> <43004FC4-43C2-4B52-99C8-33A9360DEA30@eggert.org>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <9b4112ad-afbc-80b3-427e-61e9c883bebb@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 12:33:09 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <43004FC4-43C2-4B52-99C8-33A9360DEA30@eggert.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6gip/NbWhYHtJr0oeIAu5jo2PHpKYo2U>
Subject: Re: [6gip] 6G
X-BeenThere: 6gip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IP Issues in 6th Generation Mobile Network System \(6gip\)" <6gip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6gip>, <mailto:6gip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6gip/>
List-Post: <mailto:6gip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6gip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6gip>, <mailto:6gip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 11:33:22 -0000


Le 14/01/2021 à 09:52, Lars Eggert a écrit :
> The limits here are due to physical constraints - the speed of light in vacuum is about 300000 km/sec. An RTT of 1us means that the maximum distance to a base station needs to be below 150m. (Not including coding overheads, etc.)

The distance situation of base stations is not an impediment to achieve 
high bandwidths.

The presence of too many base stations was felt as a drawback also at 
the time prior to existence of mobile telephony.  But nowadays there are 
many base stations in densely populated areas, such as stadiums, markets 
and more.  Some times they might even be at a few hundred meters distance.

The choice of placing base stations is a matter of planning and 
agreements with the local Mayor or administrators of the real estate 
(oftentimes without involving the Citizen, but that's an Ethics issue).

The choice of placing base stations might also have to do with the 
technology used in that base station, and about the form of the 
landscape in the area.  It has to do with how waves propagates and reflects.

Active base stations vs intelligent reflecting surfaces, beam forming, 
and other wave propagation improvement tools will not prevent this 
efficient placement, and thus the obtention of higher bandwidths.

BEsides, there is also the parallelism principle: if 1microsecond cant 
be achieved by one light stream then it might be achieved by two 
simultaneous light streams, or 4, and so on.   If it can be achieved by 
n lighstreams then it can be achieved by m (larger than n) THz streams. 
  It seems light is in the range 400-700 THz.

Or maybe that's where 'fully optical' might join fiber to smartphones...

Alex