Re: [78attendees] We'll meet again...

"Monique Morrow (mmorrow)" <mmorrow@cisco.com> Fri, 06 August 2010 06:00 UTC

Return-Path: <mmorrow@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: 78attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 78attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90E243A67F6 for <78attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Aug 2010 23:00:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.098, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aWHBBTCYNzTU for <78attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Aug 2010 22:59:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-4.cisco.com (sj-iport-4.cisco.com [171.68.10.86]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EED13A6768 for <78attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Aug 2010 22:59:59 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-4.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAI1BW0yrRN+J/2dsb2JhbACgOXGpDJsphToEi3o
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.55,326,1278288000"; d="scan'208,217"; a="168402309"
Received: from sj-core-3.cisco.com ([171.68.223.137]) by sj-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 06 Aug 2010 06:00:30 +0000
Received: from xbh-ams-101.cisco.com (xbh-ams-101.cisco.com [144.254.74.71]) by sj-core-3.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o765xiTj024370; Fri, 6 Aug 2010 06:00:30 GMT
Received: from xmb-ams-110.cisco.com ([144.254.74.85]) by xbh-ams-101.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 6 Aug 2010 08:00:13 +0200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CB352C.A223C1D0"
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 08:00:04 +0200
Message-ID: <317616CE96204D49B5A1811098BA895002787844@XMB-AMS-110.cisco.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [78attendees] We'll meet again...
Thread-Index: AcswJHf5D11Do0krT6eBWGIZnN4E0wEsWFswABWxD70=
References: <4C528047.20008@sidn.nl><C2D311A6F086424F99E385949ECFEBCB03453A16@CORPUSMX80B.corp.emc.com><4C5288FF.7000102@att.com> <4C53159C.2040806@ogud.com><5CC58151-05C5-45CE-BCE6-13A6BF3731D3@nominum.com> <A4C6A166C36F5F40A5767E6F66358FC090ED0CF769@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net>
From: "Monique Morrow (mmorrow)" <mmorrow@cisco.com>
To: "Thomas Walsh" <twalsh@juniper.net>, "Ted Lemon" <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>, "Olafur Gudmundsson" <ogud@ogud.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Aug 2010 06:00:13.0030 (UTC) FILETIME=[A2706860:01CB352C]
Cc: 78attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [78attendees] We'll meet again...
X-BeenThere: 78attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 78 attendees list <78attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/78attendees>, <mailto:78attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/78attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:78attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:78attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/78attendees>, <mailto:78attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2010 06:00:01 -0000

+1!


-----Original Message-----
From: 78attendees-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of Thomas Walsh
Sent: Thu 8/5/2010 12:42 PM
To: Ted Lemon; Olafur Gudmundsson
Cc: 78attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [78attendees] We'll meet again...
 
I agree we should consider smaller cities as well. Maastricht (and recently Hiroshima also) did so much to make IETF attendees feel very welcome. Maastricht was a wonderful city and I too would like to thank the hosts for a nice job last week.

-----Original Message-----
From: 78attendees-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:78attendees-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ted Lemon
Sent: Friday, July 30, 2010 1:19 PM
To: Olafur Gudmundsson
Cc: 78attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [78attendees] We'll meet again...

On Jul 30, 2010, at 7:11 PM, "Olafur Gudmundsson" <ogud@ogud.com> wrote:

> Overall I think my preference for IETF meetings is smaller cities as we 
> get treated better and it just feels good to visit towns that appreciate 
> that we are there.

Yup. Maastricht was lovely. My windows were surprisingly soundproof, which was a good thing...   The bus service was great too--it's nice to see a city where public transit really works.  Seeing the guy riding his bike with the Weimaraner running beside out the bus window was a highlight.  
_______________________________________________
78attendees mailing list
78attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/78attendees
_______________________________________________
78attendees mailing list
78attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/78attendees