Re: [78attendees] We'll meet again...
Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com> Fri, 06 August 2010 15:11 UTC
Return-Path: <ole@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: 78attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 78attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABDD628C0F9 for <78attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Aug 2010 08:11:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.498
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.498 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.101, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GlCU6LXCzHdV for <78attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Aug 2010 08:11:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com (sj-iport-5.cisco.com [171.68.10.87]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 764FF28C0E3 for <78attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Aug 2010 08:11:24 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-5.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAOLCW0yrR7H+/2dsb2JhbACgP3GpT4IQDAGZOIMKgjAEhCWFEg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.55,329,1278288000"; d="scan'208";a="236716761"
Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com ([171.71.177.254]) by sj-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 06 Aug 2010 15:11:54 +0000
Received: from pita.cisco.com (pita.cisco.com [171.71.177.199]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o76FBsQd009084; Fri, 6 Aug 2010 15:11:54 GMT
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2010 08:09:30 -0700
From: Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com>
To: Thomas Walsh <twalsh@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <A4C6A166C36F5F40A5767E6F66358FC090ED0CFC6E@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.63.1008060746460.5592@pita.cisco.com>
References: <4C528047.20008@sidn.nl> <C2D311A6F086424F99E385949ECFEBCB03453A16@CORPUSMX80B.corp.emc.com> <4C5288FF.7000102@att.com> <4C53159C.2040806@ogud.com> <5CC58151-05C5-45CE-BCE6-13A6BF3731D3@nominum.com> <A4C6A166C36F5F40A5767E6F66358FC090ED0CF769@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net>, <20100806042805.GA7232@nsn.com> <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B21FE98EF7C@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com> <A4C6A166C36F5F40A5767E6F66358FC090ED0CFC6E@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Cc: "78attendees@ietf.org" <78attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [78attendees] We'll meet again...
X-BeenThere: 78attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com>
List-Id: IETF 78 attendees list <78attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/78attendees>, <mailto:78attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/78attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:78attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:78attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/78attendees>, <mailto:78attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2010 15:11:26 -0000
Cities like Maastricht and Hiroshima offer the "all in one place" experience. Pretty much everything your would want to see/buy/eat could be gotten to by foot, a short cab ride or even the tram. This is also very much true for places like Oslo, Vancouver, and yes Amsterdam (apart from the separation of venue and hotels for an event as large as the IETF). This has a lot more to do with geography than it has to do with population density. Ole Ole J. Jacobsen Editor and Publisher, The Internet Protocol Journal Cisco Systems Tel: +1 408-527-8972 Mobile: +1 415-370-4628 E-mail: ole@cisco.com URL: http://www.cisco.com/ipj On Fri, 6 Aug 2010, Thomas Walsh wrote: > Perhaps smaller isn't the right word. Some people were complaining > about having easier airline access than Maastricht or Hiroshima > afforded. Applying that as a screen would have meant missing such > wonderful venues as these two. I'd like to keep the focus on the > nice job of the Maastricht host. > > -----Original Message----- > From: WORLEY, Dale R (Dale) [mailto:dworley@avaya.com] > Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 7:23 AM > To: David Kessens; Thomas Walsh > Cc: 78attendees@ietf.org > Subject: RE: [78attendees] We'll meet again... > > ________________________________________ > From: 78attendees-bounces@ietf.org [78attendees-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of David Kessens [david.kessens@nsn.com] > > I am wondering, what is your definition of a small city ? Hiroshima's > population would be the 4th largest city of the US if transplanted to the > US. Or to say it in another way, it is larger than San Jose and San > Francisco combined. > _______________________________________________ > > Though Hiroshima would rank only 20th considering metro area populations. But the 20th ranked metro area in the US is Denver, and nobody would consider Denver to be "too small" to host an IETF. > > Hiroshima's metro population is about 20 times that of Maastricht. > > Dale > _______________________________________________ > 78attendees mailing list > 78attendees@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/78attendees >
- [78attendees] We'll meet again... Marco Davids
- Re: [78attendees] We'll meet again... Fahd A. Batayneh
- Re: [78attendees] We'll meet again... Marshall Eubanks
- Re: [78attendees] We'll meet again... Scott Brim
- Re: [78attendees] We'll meet again... david.black
- Re: [78attendees] We'll meet again... Tony Hansen
- Re: [78attendees] We'll meet again... Olafur Gudmundsson
- Re: [78attendees] We'll meet again... Ted Lemon
- Re: [78attendees] We'll meet again... Thomas Walsh
- Re: [78attendees] We'll meet again... WORLEY, Dale R (Dale)
- Re: [78attendees] We'll meet again... David Kessens
- Re: [78attendees] We'll meet again... Monique Morrow (mmorrow)
- Re: [78attendees] We'll meet again... Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
- Re: [78attendees] We'll meet again... WORLEY, Dale R (Dale)
- Re: [78attendees] We'll meet again... Thomas Walsh
- Re: [78attendees] We'll meet again... Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [78attendees] We'll meet again... Spencer Dawkins
- Re: [78attendees] We'll meet again... Joe Touch
- Re: [78attendees] We'll meet again... Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [78attendees] We'll meet again... David Kessens
- Re: [78attendees] We'll meet again... joel jaeggli
- Re: [78attendees] We'll meet again... Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [78attendees] We'll meet again... K KIM
- Re: [78attendees] We'll meet again... Geert Jan de Groot
- Re: [78attendees] We'll meet again... Ted Lemon
- Re: [78attendees] We'll meet again... Haibin Song
- Re: [78attendees] We'll meet again... Mary Barnes
- Re: [78attendees] We'll meet again... Elwell, John
- Re: [78attendees] We'll meet again... Ted Lemon
- Re: [78attendees] We'll meet again... Mary Barnes
- Re: [78attendees] We'll meet again... K KIM
- Re: [78attendees] We'll meet again... Miquel van Smoorenburg
- Re: [78attendees] We'll meet again... Scott Brim
- Re: [78attendees] We'll meet again... Mary Barnes
- Re: [78attendees] We'll meet again... Joe Touch
- Re: [78attendees] We'll meet again... Scott Brim
- Re: [78attendees] We'll meet again... Ted Lemon
- Re: [78attendees] We'll meet again... Ted Lemon
- [78attendees] We gotta stop meeting like this (wa… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [78attendees] We gotta stop meeting like this… Ted Lemon
- Re: [78attendees] We gotta stop meeting like this… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [78attendees] We gotta stop meeting like this… Ted Lemon
- Re: [78attendees] We gotta stop meeting like this… Barry Leiba
- Re: [78attendees] We gotta stop meeting like this Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [78attendees] We'll meet again... Lou Berger
- Re: [78attendees] We gotta stop meeting like this… Ted Lemon
- Re: [78attendees] We'll meet again... Randall Gellens
- Re: [78attendees] We'll meet again... Randall Gellens